Cited by 18Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAortic Thrombus and EmbolismCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Atherosclerosis is associated with poorer outcome in non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia

Open access
Juif, Arnaud, Calame, Paul, Winiszewski, Hadrien, Turco, Celia, Verdot, Pierre, Pili-Floury, Sebastien, Piton, Gael, Delabrousse, Eric·2021·European Journal of Radiology

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate whether abdominal atherosclerosis was associated with poorer outcome in a single-centre cohort of patients suffering from nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI). Methods From January 2009 to December 2019, 121 consecutive patients from the critical care unit who underwent laparotomy for suspected NOMI and with available unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT were included. Clinical and biological data at the time of the CT scan were retrospectively extracted from medical charts and reviewed by a single radiologist. Unenhanced CT acquisitions were used to calculate calcium scores of the abdominal aorta, celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and common iliac arteries according to the Agatston method. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. Results Among the 121 patients with NOMI and calcium score calculation, only 4 patients had no aortic calcifications (3 %) and 32 had no superior mesenteric artery calcification (26 %). 35 patients (29 %) died within 24 h after the abdominal CT scan. Univariate analysis showed that a total abdominal calcium score greater than 15 000 (last quartile) was significantly associated with death within 24 h (14 (40 %) vs 17 (20 %) patients, p = 0.035). By multivariate analysis, a total abdominal calcium score greater than 15 000 was an independent risk factor for death (HR = 1.94, 95 %CI [1.02-3.73], p = 0.044). Regarding separate calcium scores, only a SMA calcium score greater than 50 was a risk factor for death (HR 2.46, 95 %CI [1.14-3.93], p = 0.019). Conclusion Our results show that abdominal atherosclerosis, especially in the SMA, is associated with poorer outcome in NOMI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109453

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Juif, A., Calame, P., Winiszewski, H., Turco, C., Verdot, P., Pili-Floury, S., Piton, G., & Delabrousse, E.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR)
Corresponding author
Calame, Paul
Venue
European Journal of Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
134
Pages
109453
ISSN
0720-048X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3108706023
Cited by
18
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Radiology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Thrombus and Embolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia, aortic calcification, calcium score, mortality, prognostic factors, acute mesenteric ischemia, intensive care
MeSH terms
Humans, Ischemia, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Mesenteric Artery, Superior, Atherosclerosis, Mesenteric Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review