Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics of the Pancreas Predict Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula?
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate whether a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics-based machine learning classifier can predict postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and to compare its performance to T1 signal intensity ratio (T1 SIratio).Methods Sixty-two patients who underwent 3 T MRI before PD between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. POPF was graded and split into clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) vs. biochemical leak or no POPF. On T1- and T2-weighted images, 2 regions of interest were placed in the pancreatic corpus and cauda. 173 radiomics features were extracted using pyRadiomics. Additionally, the pancreas-to-muscle T1 SIratio was measured. The dataset was augmented and split into training (70 %) and test sets (30 %). A Boruta algorithm was used for feature reduction. For prediction of CR-POPF models were built using a gradient-boosted tree (GBT) and logistic regression from the radiomics features, T1 SIratio and a combination of the two. Diagnostic accuracy of the models was compared using areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUCs).Results Five most important radiomics features were identified for prediction of CR-POPF. A GBT using these features achieved an AUC of 0.82 (95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.74 - 0.89) when applied on the original (non-augmented) dataset. Using T1 SIratio, a GBT model resulted in an AUC of 0.75 (CI: 0.63 - 0.84) and a logistic regression model delivered an AUC of 0.75 (CI: 0.63 - 0.84). A GBT model combining radiomics features and T1 SIratio resulted in an AUC of 0.90 (CI 0.84 - 0.95).Conclusion MRI-radiomics with routine sequences provides promising prediction of CR-POPF.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Radiology is one step ahead and shows what is possible with the emerging field of radiomics-the extraction of data from radiograms to diagnose cancer, predict outcomes or guide therapy.
“Radiology is one step ahead and shows what is possible with the emerging field of radiomics—the extraction of data from radiograms to diagnose cancer, predict outcomes or guide therapy (54–56).”
From Artificial Intelligence: Present and Future Potential for Solid Organ Transplantation (2022) · cites this paper as [56]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Skawran, S. M., Kambakamba, P., Baessler, B., von Spiczak, J., Kupka, M., Müller, P. C., Moeckli, B., Linecker, M., Petrowsky, H., & Reiner, C. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Reiner, Caecilia S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Radiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 140
- Pages
- 109733
- ISSN
- 0720-048X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3158534674
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
- Keywords
- postoperative pancreatic fistula, pancreaticoduodenectomy, radiomics, magnetic resonance imaging, pancreatic imaging, clinical risk prediction, gradient boosting decision tree, feature selection, Boruta
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pancreas, Pancreatic Fistula, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Pancreaticoduodenectomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review