Hydrogeological control of groundwater variations in the Congo River Basin revealed by GRACE water storage change decomposition
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Groundwater (GW) represents nearly a quarter of total human water consumption globally and is a key component of many natural cycles and processes. Despite its crucial importance as a source of drinking water within the Congo River basin (CRB), its temporal and spatial variability is still barely known, mainly due to a lack of GW monitoring networks. Here, we provide an unprecedented quantification of the temporal dynamics and, for the first time, the spatial distribution Groundwater Storage Anomaly (GWSA) in CRB from 2002 to 2015, through the decomposition of the Total Water Storage Anomaly (TWSA) measured by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission. The relative contributions of each hydrological reservoir, including surface water storage, root-zone soil moisture, and GW, represent, respectively, ~18%, ~59%, and ~23% of the seasonal amplitude of TWSA (~365 ± 105 km3), in line with previous model-based estimates. Moreover, the mean annual amplitude of GWSA is found to be ~121 ± 30 km3. Additionally, at sub-basin scale, our study reveals that GWSA ranges between 42% (for Ubangui and Kasai) and 16% (for Lower-Congo) of TWSA. The spatial distribution of GWSA also confirms the expected hydrogeological behavior for each type of aquifer related to the four main hydrogeological formations encountered in CRB with high GWSA variability and high Base-Flow Index (BFI) in unconsolidated (BFI = 0.58) and consolidated (BFI = 0.60) sedimentary aquifers in contrast with lower GWSA variability and BFI in fracture flow (BFI = 0.28) and basement (BFI = 0.22) aquifers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Kitambo, B. M., Wongchuig, S., Tshimanga, R. M., Paris, A., Blazquez, A., Moreira, D., Frappart, F., Fleischmann, A. S., Kileshye, J.-M. O., Tourian, M. J., & Papa, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Stuttgart (DE)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of Kinshasa (CD)
- Serviço Geológico do Brasil - CPRM (BR)
- Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Kitambo, Benjamin M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-12
- Volume
- 62
- Pages
- 102810
- ISSN
- 2214-5818 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4414694300
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- French Space Agency
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Keywords
- groundwater storage anomalies, Congo River basin, root-zone soil moisture, baseflow index, aquifer type, basement aquifers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review