Analysis of the elective treatment process for critical limb ischaemia with tissue loss: diabetic patients require rapid revascularisation.
Open accessAbstract
Objectives The number of elderly people is increasing; inevitably, the result will be more patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI) in the future. Tissue loss in CLI is related to a high risk of major amputation. The aim of this study was to analyze the treatment process from referral to revascularisation, to discover possible delays and reasons behind them, and to distinguish patients benefitting the most from early revascularisation.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of 394 consecutive patients with a combined 447 affected limbs, referred to the outpatient clinic during 2010-2011 for tissue loss of suspected ischaemic origin.Results For 246 limbs revascularisation was scheduled. After changes in the initial treatment strategy, endovascular treatment (ET) was performed on 221 and open surgery (OS) on 45 limbs. Notably there was crossover after ET in 17.0% of the procedures, and re-revascularisations were required in 40.1% after ET and 31.1% after OS. The median time from referral to revascularisation was 43 days (range 1-657 days) with no significant difference between ET and OS. For 29 (11.8%) patients the ischaemic limb required an emergency operation scheduled at the first visit to the outpatient clinic. For 25 (10.2%) patients the situation worsened while waiting for elective revascularisation and an emergency procedure was performed. Diabetic patients formed the majority of the study population, with 159 diabetic feet undergoing revascularisation. In multivariate analysis, diabetes was associated with poor limb salvage. When revascularisation was achieved within 2 weeks, no difference was seen in limb salvage. However, when the delay from first visit to revascularisation exceeded 2 weeks, limb salvage was significantly poorer in diabetic patients.Conclusions Diabetic ulcers always require vascular evaluation, and when ischaemia is suspected the diagnostics should be organised rapidly to ensure revascularisation without delay, according to this study within 2 weeks from the first evaluation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a meta-analysis of 943 patients, negative pressure wound therapy improved healing compared with standard moisture-balancing dressings (odds ratio, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.38-5.45; P < .001).
“Negative pressure wound therapy Used in treatment of complicated and postoperative wounds in the diabetic foot Improved healing in a meta-analysis of 943 patients who received negative pressure wound therapy vs standard moisture-balancing dressings (odds ratio, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.38-5.45;P < .001).”
From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [75]
Negative pressure wound therapy is effective in resolving wound depth.
“Effective in resolving wound depth.64,[73][74][75]”
From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [75]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Noronen, K., Saarinen, E., Albäck, A., & Venermo, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Noronen, K.
- Venue
- European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 206-213
- ISSN
- 1078-5884 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2550095978
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Aarne and Aili Turunen foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vascular Procedures and Complications
- Keywords
- critical limb ischemia, diabetic foot, revascularization, endovascular treatment, treatment delay, limb salvage, diabetic ulcers, emergency amputation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Amputation, Surgical, Emergencies, Female, Humans, Ischemia, Male, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Wound Healing, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Critical Illness, Treatment Outcome, Elective Surgical Procedures, Diabetic Foot, Limb Salvage, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Endovascular Procedures, Peripheral Arterial Disease, Time-to-Treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review