Cited by 7Peripheral Artery Disease ManagementDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementVascular Procedures and Complications

Editor's Choice – Delays to Revascularisation and Outcomes of Non-Elective Admissions for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: a UK Population Based Cohort Study

Open access
Birmpili, Panagiota, Li, Qiuju, Johal, Amundeep S., Atkins, Eleanor, Waton, Sam, Pherwani, Arun D., Williams, Robin, Chetter, Ian +2 more·2025·European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Major amputation and death are significant outcomes after lower limb revascularisation for chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI), but there is limited evidence on their association with the timing of revascularisation. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between time from non-elective admission to revascularisation and one year outcomes for patients with CLTI. METHODS: This was an observational, population based cohort study of patients aged ≥ 50 years with CLTI admitted non-electively for infrainguinal revascularisation procedures in English National Health Service hospitals from January 2017 to December 2019 recorded in the Hospital Episode Statistics database. Outcomes were death and ipsilateral major amputation rate at one year. Logistic regression models were fitted to explore the relationship between time to revascularisation and death, adjusted for patient and admission factors. For major amputation, multinomial logistic regression models were used to account for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: A total of 10 183 patients (median age 75 years) were included in the analysis, of which 67.1% (n = 6 831) were male and 57.6% had diabetes. In patients with tissue loss, the unadjusted one year mortality rate was 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.9 - 31.0%), and for every one day increase in time from admission to revascularisation, the adjusted odds of one year death increased by 3% (odds ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.04). In the absence of tissue loss, the unadjusted one year mortality rate was 19.9% (95% CI 18.4 - 21.4%) and there was no evidence of an association with time to revascularisation. There was also no statistically significant association between the time to revascularisation and risk of ipsilateral major amputation at one year irrespective of tissue loss. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularisation during non-elective admissions for CLTI have high one year major amputation and mortality rates. Longer time from admission to revascularisation was independently associated with a higher mortality rate in patients with tissue loss, but not in those without.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.12.038

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Birmpili, P., Li, Q., Johal, A. S., Atkins, E., Waton, S., Pherwani, A. D., Williams, R., Chetter, I., Boyle, J. R., & Cromwell, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Surgeons of England (GB)
  • Royal Stoke University Hospital (GB)
  • Freeman Hospital (GB)
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Birmpili, Panagiota
Venue
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-04
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
640-648
ISSN
1078-5884 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405740137
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal College of Surgeons of England
  • Vascular Society
  • Circulation Foundation
  • Llywodraeth Cymru
  • British Society of Interventional radiology
  • Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vascular Procedures and Complications
Keywords
chronic limb threatening ischaemia, non-elective admission, major amputation, mortality, tissue loss, lower limb ischemia
MeSH terms
Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amputation, Surgical, Chronic Disease, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Ischemia, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Limb Salvage, Lower Extremity, Peripheral Arterial Disease, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review