The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigations of lithium–sulfur batteries using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), which obtains the impedance over a wide range of frequencies by measuring the current response to a voltage perturbation or vice versa19–21, is known to contain rich information on all materials properties, interfacial phenomena and electrochemical reactions.”
From Identifying degradation patterns of lithium ion batteries from impedance spectroscopy using machine learning (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“the fit is often non-unique and it is questionable whether a purely electrical model can capture the physical, chemical and materials properties and processes of a battery”
From Identifying degradation patterns of lithium ion batteries from impedance spectroscopy using machine learning (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Polysulfide Shuttle Study in the Li/S Battery System
Mikhaylik, Y., & Akridge, J. R. (2004) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1806394 · Cited by 2,112
Lithium–sulphur batteries with a microporous carbon paper as a bifunctional interlayer
Su, Y., & Manthiram, A. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2163 · Cited by 1,467
On the use of vinylene carbonate (VC) as an additive to electrolyte solutions for Li-ion batteries
Aurbach, D., Gamolsky, K., Markovsky, B., Gofer, Y., Schmidt, M., & Heider, U. (2002) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0013-4686(01)00858-1 · Cited by 996
Barchasz, C., Molton, F., Duboc, C., Leprêtre, J., Patoux, S., & Alloin, F. (2012) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac2032244 · Cited by 958
Li, G. C., Li, G., Ye, S. H., & Gao, X. (2012) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201200017 · Cited by 526
Improved cycling performances of lithium sulfur batteries with LiNO3-modified electrolyte
Liang, X. M., Wen, Z., Liu, Y., Wu, M., Jin, J. H., Zhang, H., & Wu, X. (2011) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.027 · Cited by 506
Phosphorous Pentasulfide as a Novel Additive for High‐Performance Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries
Lin, Z., Liu, Z., Fu, W., Dudney, N. J., & Liang, C. (2012) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201200696 · Cited by 457
New insights into the limiting parameters of the Li/S rechargeable cell
Barchasz, C., Leprêtre, J., Alloin, F., & Patoux, S. (2011) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.021 · Cited by 398
New insight into the discharge process of sulfur cathode by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
Yuan, L., Qiu, X., Chen, L., et al. (2008) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.033 · Cited by 380
Xiong, S., Xie, K., Diao, Y., & Hong, X. (2012) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.118 · Cited by 371
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S., Zu, C., & Su, Y. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500062v · Cited by 4,710
Lithium sulfur batteries, a mechanistic review
Wild, M., O’Neill, L., Zhang, T., Purkayastha, R. T., Minton, G., Marinescu, M., & Offer, G. J. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee01388g · Cited by 1,105
Zhang, Y., Tang, Q., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Stimming, U., & Lee, A. A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15235-7 · Cited by 889
Yao, H., Yan, K., Li, W., Zheng, G. W., Kong, D., Seh, Z. W., Narasimhan, V. K., Liang, Z., & Cui, Y. (2014) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee01377h · Cited by 526
Entrapment of Polysulfides by a Black‐Phosphorus‐Modified Separator for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Sun, J., Sun, Y., Pasta, M., Zhou, G., Li, Y., Liu, W., Xiong, F., & Cui, Y. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201602172 · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- Cañas, N. A., Hirose, K., Pascucci, B., Wagner, N., Friedrich, K. A., & Hiesgen, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Stuttgart (DE)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Esslingen University of Applied Sciences (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Cañas, Natalia A.
- Venue
- Electrochimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 97
- Pages
- 42-51
- ISSN
- 0013-4686 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4239902730
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 15.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Electrochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Keywords
- lithium-sulfur batteries, electrochemical impedance, charge transfer resistance, cathode degradation, equivalent circuit model, capacity fade, depth of discharge, cycling stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
