The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrochemical processes for the environmental remediation of toxic Cr(VI): A review
Open accessAbstract
Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is extremely toxic and classified as one of the 17 chemicals posing the greatest threat to humans. Large amounts of Cr(VI) compounds are directly or indirectly discharged into the environment, therefore considerable efforts have been made to control the Cr(VI) concentration below the recommended level. It has been demonstrated that electrochemical technique is one of the most efficient and environmental benign approach for the Cr(VI) removal. This review aims at recent advances in electrochemical technology for practical Cr(VI) treatment applications. By using the "clean reagent" of electron, Cr(VI) can be completely eliminated or separated via different electrochemical techniques such as electrocoagulation, electrochemical reduction, electrodialysis, electro-electrodialysis and electrodeionization. Besides, the mechanism and performance of different strategies are commented and compared. The treatment process is largely dependent on variables such as pH, electrode materials, cell configuration and techniques integration. Furthermore, the remained limitation and challenges for the electrochemical Cr(VI) remediation are also discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review
Fu, F., & Wang, Q. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 · Cited by 8,703
Electro-Fenton Process and Related Electrochemical Technologies Based on Fenton’s Reaction Chemistry
Brillas, E., Sirés, I., & Oturan, M. A. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900136g · Cited by 3,437
Chromium in Drinking Water: Sources, Metabolism, and Cancer Risks
Zhitkovich, A. (2011) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx200251t · Cited by 1,132
Cited by
A critical review on bioremediation technologies for Cr(VI)-contaminated soils and wastewater
Xia, S., Song, Z., Jeyakumar, P., Shaheen, S. M., Rinklebe, J., Ok, Y. S., Bolan, N., & Wang, H. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2018.1564526 · Cited by 490
Jiang, B., Gong, Y., Gao, J., Sun, T., Liu, Y., Oturan, N., & Oturan, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.070 · Cited by 365
A state-of-the-art review of the electrocoagulation technology for wastewater treatment
Boinpally, S., Kolla, A., Kainthola, J., Kodali, R., & Vemuri, J. (2023) · Water Cycle · doi:10.1016/j.watcyc.2023.01.001 · Cited by 304
Jin, W., Fu, Y., Hu, M., Wang, S., & Liu, Z. (2020) · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113744 · Cited by 93
Self-citationXing, X., Alharbi, N. S., Ren, X., & Chen, C. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2022.107325 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, W., Du, H., Zheng, S., & Zhang, Y.
- Venue
- Electrochimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 191
- Pages
- 1044-1055
- ISSN
- 0013-4686 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2338234969
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
