Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Deconvoluting electrode polarization resistances underestimated due to electronic leakage in proton ceramic cells

Roen, Stine, Strandbakke, Ragnar, Norby, Truls, Polfus, Jonathan M.·2026·Electrochimica Acta

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.electacta.2026.149534

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 2

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Dubois, 2017, Benchmarking the expected stack manufacturing cost of next generation, intermediate-temperature protonic ceramic fuel cells with solid oxide fuel cell technology, Journal of Power Sources, 369, 65, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.024 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.024
  2. Duan, 2020, Proton-conducting oxides for energy conversion and storage, Applied Physics Reviews, 7, 10.1063/1.5135319 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hauch, 2020, Recent advances in solid oxide cell technology for electrolysis, Science, 370, 10.1126/science.aba6118 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Lai, 2005, Impedance Spectroscopy as a Tool for Chemical and Electrochemical Analysis of Mixed Conductors: A Case Study of Ceria, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 88, 2979, 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00740.x · doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00740.x
  5. Nomura, 2007, Transport properties of Ba(Zr0.8Y0.2)O3−δ perovskite, Solid State Ionics, 178, 661, 10.1016/j.ssi.2007.02.010 · DOI
  6. J.D. Huang, C. Meisel, N.P. Sullivan, A. Zakutayev, R. O’Hayre, Rapid mapping of electrochemical processes in energy-conversion devices, Joule (2024) S2542435124002034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2024.05.003. · DOI
  7. Sumi, 2023, External Current Dependence of Polarization Resistances for Reversible Solid Oxide and Protonic Ceramic Cells with Current Leakage, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 6, 1853, 10.1021/acsaem.2c03733 · doi:10.1021/acsaem.2c03733
  8. Zhu, 2025, How can current leakage Be reduced in protonic ceramic electrolysis cells? Insights from Thermo-electrochemical modeling, Journal of Power Sources, 642, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236957 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236957
  9. Kreuer, 1999, Aspects of the formation and mobility of protonic charge carriers and the stability of perovskite-type oxides, Solid State Ionics, 125, 285, 10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00188-5 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Huang, 2021, Effects of NiO addition on sintering and proton uptake of Ba(Zr,Ce,Y)O3−δ, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 9, 14775, 10.1039/D1TA02555D · doi:10.1039/d1ta02555d
  11. Ricote, 2011, Conductivity, transport number measurements and hydration thermodynamics of BaCe0.2Zr0.7Y(0.1−ξ)NiξO(3−δ), Solid State Ionics, 185, 11, 10.1016/j.ssi.2010.12.012 · doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2010.12.012
  12. Vøllestad, 2013, Interpretation of Defect and Gas-Phase Fluxes through Mixed-Conducting Ceramics Using Nernst–Planck–Poisson and Integral Formulations, J. Electrochem. Soc., 161, F114, 10.1149/2.067401jes · doi:10.1149/2.067401jes
  13. Zhu, 2018, Defect Incorporation and Transport within Dense BaZr0.8Y0.2O3−δ (BZY20) Proton-Conducting Membranes, J. Electrochem. Soc., 165, F581, 10.1149/2.0161809jes · doi:10.1149/2.0161809jes
  14. Zhu, 2018, Defect Chemistry and Transport within Dense BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.1Yb0.1O3−δ (BCZYYb) Proton-Conducting Membranes, J. Electrochem. Soc., 165, F845, 10.1149/2.1091810jes · doi:10.1149/2.1091810jes
  15. Vøllestad, 2019, Mixed proton and electron conducting double perovskite anodes for stable and efficient tubular proton ceramic electrolysers, Nat. Mater., 18, 752, 10.1038/s41563-019-0388-2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Guan, 2024, Unraveling the conundrum of electronic leakage in protonic ceramic cells: Operation-specific insights and rational design strategies, Journal of Power Sources, 604, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234454 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234454
  17. Poetzsch, 2013, Investigation of oxygen exchange kinetics in proton-conducting ceramic fuel cells: Effect of electronic leakage current using symmetric cells, Journal of Power Sources, 242, 784, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.108 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.108
  18. Antonova, 2014, Polarization resistance of platinum electrodes in contact with proton-conducting La0.9Sr0.1ScO3–δ, Russ J Electrochem, 50, 613, 10.1134/S1023193514070027 · doi:10.1134/s1023193514070027
  19. Antonova, 2024, Composite LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3−δ‒La0.9Sr0.1Sc0.9Co0.1O3−δ cathodes for proton conducting solid oxide fuel cells: Electrode kinetics study, Ceramics International, 50, 40492, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.04.025 · doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.04.025
  20. Antonova, 2020, Electrode performance of La2NiO4+δ cathodes in contact with La0.9Sr0.1ScO3−δ proton-conducting oxide, J Solid State Electrochem, 24, 1447, 10.1007/s10008-020-04535-z · doi:10.1007/s10008-020-04535-z
  21. Fedorova, 2026, Revealing the Oxygen Reduction Kinetics on Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ‒Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 Composites as Cathodes for H+ Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, JOM, 78, 24, 10.1007/s11837-025-07799-w · doi:10.1007/s11837-025-07799-w
  22. Strandbakke, 2015, Gd- and Pr-based double perovskite cobaltites as oxygen electrodes for proton ceramic fuel cells and electrolyser cells, Solid State Ionics, 278, 120, 10.1016/j.ssi.2015.05.014 · doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2015.05.014
  23. Poetzsch, 2015, Oxygen Reduction at Dense Thin-Film Microelectrodes on a Proton-Conducting Electrolyte: I. Considerations on Reaction Mechanism and Electronic Leakage Effects, J. Electrochem. Soc., 162, F939, 10.1149/2.0951508jes · DOI
  24. Kreuer, 2001, Proton conducting alkaline earth zirconates and titanates for high drain electrochemical applications, Solid State Ionics, 145, 295, 10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00953-5 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Dayaghi, 2023, Effects of sintering additives on defect chemistry and hydration of BaZr0.4Ce0.4(Y,Yb)0.2O3−δ proton conducting electrolytes, Solid State Ionics, 401, 10.1016/j.ssi.2023.116355 · doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2023.116355
  26. Wen, 2026, Nickel-Induced Lattice Defects Limit Proton Uptake in Barium Zirconate Electrolytes, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 148, 379, 10.1021/jacs.5c13935 · doi:10.1021/jacs.5c13935
  27. Bian, 2022, Revitalizing interface in protonic ceramic cells by acid etching, Nature, 604, 479, 10.1038/s41586-022-04457-y · DOI · Paper page
  28. H. Andersen, A.M. Dayaghi, B. Jiang, J.M. Polfus, A. Rosnes, Effective acceptor concentration and exsolution of transition metal nanoparticles from proton-conducting oxide electrolytes based on Y-doped, (2024). https://doi.org/10.15151/ESRF-ES-1550904430. · doi:10.15151/esrf-es-1550904430
  29. Dyadkin, 2016, A new multipurpose diffractometer PILATUS@SNBL, J Synchrotron Rad, 23, 825, 10.1107/S1600577516002411 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Coelho, 2018, TOPAS and TOPAS-Academic: an optimization program integrating computer algebra and crystallographic objects written in C++, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 51, 210, 10.1107/S1600576718000183 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Raimondi, 2023, Impact of first-row transition metals in (Ba,La)(Fe,TM)O3−δ on proton uptake and electronic conductivity, Solid State Ionics, 391, 10.1016/j.ssi.2023.116143 · DOI
  32. Ricote, 2009, Water vapour solubility and conductivity study of the proton conductor BaCe(0.9–x)ZrxY0.1O(3–δ), Solid State Ionics, 180, 990, 10.1016/j.ssi.2009.03.016 · doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2009.03.016
  33. Heras-Juaristi, 2017, Temperature dependence of partial conductivities of the BaZr0.7Ce0.2Y0.1O3–δ proton conductor, Journal of Power Sources, 364, 52, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.011 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.011
  34. Zhu, 2015, Interpreting equilibrium-conductivity and conductivity-relaxation measurements to establish thermodynamic and transport properties for multiple charged defect conducting ceramics, Faraday Discussions, 182, 49, 10.1039/C5FD00012B · doi:10.1039/c5fd00012b
  35. Zhu, 2016, Membrane polarization in mixed-conducting ceramic fuel cells and electrolyzers, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41, 2931, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.10.100 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.10.100
  36. Han, 2018, Detrimental Effect of Sintering Additives on Conducting Ceramics: Yttrium-Doped Barium Zirconate, ChemSusChem, 11, 4102, 10.1002/cssc.201801837 · DOI
  37. Eisele, 2021, The effect of ionic defect interactions on the hydration of yttrium-doped barium zirconate, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 23, 4882, 10.1039/D0CP06587K · doi:10.1039/d0cp06587k
  38. Irvine, 1990, Electroceramics: characterization by impedance spectroscopy, Advanced Materials, 2, 132, 10.1002/adma.19900020304 · doi:10.1002/adma.19900020304
  39. Raimondi, 2020, X-ray Spectroscopy of (Ba,Sr,La)(Fe,Zn,Y)O3−δ Identifies Structural and Electronic Features Favoring Proton Uptake, Chem. Mater., 32, 8502, 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02655 · DOI
  40. Yu, 2025, Superior Active and Durable Air Electrode for Protonic Ceramic Cells by Metal-Oxide Bond Engineering, Small, 21
  41. Berger, 2025, Ion transport in dry and hydrated Ba0.95La0.05(Fe1−xYx)O3−δ and implications for oxygen electrode kinetics of protonic ceramic cells, J. Mater. Chem. A, 13, 21575, 10.1039/D5TA03014E · doi:10.1039/d5ta03014e
  42. Sumi, 2025, Oxygen reduction kinetics of high performance BaCo0.4Fe0.4M0.1Y0. (M = Mg, Zr) positrode for protonic ceramic fuel cells, Commun Chem, 8, 71, 10.1038/s42004-025-01468-4 · doi:10.1038/s42004-025-01468-4

Metadata

Authors
Roen, S., Strandbakke, R., Norby, T., & Polfus, J. M.
Venue
Electrochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-11
Volume
575
Pages
149534
ISSN
0013-4686
Cited by
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • ESRF
  • Research Council of Norway

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deconvoluting electrode polarization resistances underestimated due to electronic leakage in proton ceramic cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.electacta.2026.149534
The paper
Roen, S., Strandbakke, R., Norby, T., & Polfus, J. M. (2026). Deconvoluting electrode polarization resistances underestimated due to electronic leakage in proton ceramic cells. Electrochimica Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2026.149534

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.