The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding unequal turnout: Education and voting in comparative perspective
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994) · Princeton University Press · doi:10.1515/9781400821211 · Cited by 7,225
Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research
Geys, B. (2006) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2005.09.002 · Cited by 860
Labor Organization and Electoral Participation in Industrial Democracies
Radcliff, B., & Davis, P. (2000) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2669299 · Cited by 207
Cited by
The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout
Smets, K., & van Ham, C. (2013) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006 · Cited by 799
Sanhueza Petrarca, C. (2020) · Lowering the Voting Age to 16 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32541-1_6 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallego, A.
- Venue
- Electoral Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-248
- ISSN
- 0261-3794 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993614682
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 29.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.