The determinants and effects of online privacy concerns in the context of e-commerce
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These results are consistent with previous research indicating that certain dimensions of privacy concerns are affected by context (in this case, the type of app) as well as the type of data managed.
“Together, these results are consistent with previous research indicating that certain dimensions of privacy concerns are affected by context (in this case, the type of app) as well as the type of data managed (e.g., Culnan, 1993;Anic et al., 2019).”
From The privacy and control paradoxes in the context of smartphone apps (2022) · cites this paper as Anic et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 98
- Authors
- Anic, I.-D., Škare, V., & Kursan Milaković, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Zagreb (HR)
- Venue
- Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 100868
- ISSN
- 1567-4223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2952127275
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 23.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost (7913)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- online privacy concerns, e-commerce, personal data control, online purchase, Croatia, EU member states
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
