Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Design Thinking is more creative in generating product concepts compared to other standard methods.
“The DT method was chosen as the UI design method for the ERP system as it is considered more creative in generating product concepts compared to other standard methods (Meinel et al., 2020).”
From Measuring The Acceptance Level of User Interface Design of ERP System at PT Allure Alluminio Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Method (2024) · cites this paper as Meinel et al., 2020
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 23,433 · see citing works
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 · Cited by 9,349 · see citing works
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 · Cited by 3,103 · see citing works
George, J. M. (2007) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/078559814 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Barczak, G., Lassk, F., & Mulki, J. (2010) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.x · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mutoriq, A., & Purwinarko, A. (2024) · Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology · doi:10.15294/jaist.v5i2.71096 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meinel, M., Eismann, T. T., Baccarella, C. V., Fixson, S. K., & Voigt, K.-I.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Babson College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Meinel, Martin
- Venue
- European Management Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 661-671
- ISSN
- 0263-2373 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3004566364
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Keywords
- design thinking, new product concepts, product development, quality function deployment, user experience, user needs, innovative approaches
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
