Resilience of naturally ventilated buildings to climate change: Advanced natural ventilation and hospital wards
Open accessAbstract
Naturally ventilated buildings have a key role to play mitigating climate change. The predicted indoor temperatures in spaces with simple single-sided natural ventilation (SNV) are compared with those in spaces conditioned using a form of edge in, edge out advanced natural ventilation (ANV) for various UK locations. A criterion, for use in conjunction with the BSEN15251 adaptive thermal comfort method, is proposed for determining when the risk of overheating, both now and in the future, might be deemed unacceptable. The work is presented in the context building new, and refurbishing existing, healthcare buildings and in particular hospital wards. The spaces conditioned using the ANV strategy were much more resilient to increases in both internal heat gains and climatic warming than spaces with SNV. The ANV strategy used less energy, and emitted less CO2 than conventional, mechanically ventilated (MV) alternatives. In a warming world, the ‘life-expectancy’ of passively cooled buildings can be substantially influenced by the internal heat gains. Therefore, resilience to climate change, susceptibility to internal heat gains and the impact of future heat waves, should be an integral part of any new building or building refurbishment design process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Buildings with architectural elements such as a solar chimney, atrium, or double-skin façade integrated with advanced ventilation controls could provide greater resilience to future climate change than single-side natural ventilation.
“A study by Lomas and Ji [180] demonstrated that buildings with such architectural elements integrated with advanced ventilation controls could provide greater resilience to future climate change than single-side natural ventilation.”
From Resilient cooling strategies – A critical review and qualitative assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [180]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 127
- Authors
- Lomas, K. J., & Ji, Y.
- Affiliations
- Loughborough University (GB)
- De Montfort University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lomas, Kevin John
- Venue
- Energy and Buildings
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 629-653
- ISSN
- 0378-7788 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068532075
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 17.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Energy and Buildings (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
- Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Leverhulme Trust
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Solar Energy Systems and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Wind and Air Flow Studies
- Keywords
- natural ventilation, climate resilience, overheating risk, indoor thermal comfort, adaptive thermal comfort, hospital wards, medical buildings, internal heat gains, heat waves, building energy emissions, CO2 emissions, building renovation, passive cooling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review