The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Random Forest based hourly building energy prediction
Abstract
Abstract Accurate building energy prediction plays an important role in improving the energy efficiency of buildings. This paper proposes a homogeneous ensemble approach, i.e., use of Random Forest (RF), for hourly building energy prediction. The approach was adopted to predict the hourly electricity usage of two educational buildings in North Central Florida. The RF models trained with different parameter settings were compared to investigate the impact of parameter setting on the prediction performance of the model. The results indicated that RF was not very sensitive to the number of variables (mtry) and using empirical mtry is preferable because it saves time and is more accurate. RF was compared with regression tree (RT) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) to validate the superiority of RF in building energy prediction. The prediction performances of RF measured by performance index (PI) were 14–25% and 5–5.5% better than RT and SVR, respectively, indicating that RF was the best prediction model in the comparison. Moreover, an analysis based on the variable importance of RF was performed to identify the most influential features during different semesters. The results showed that the most influential features vary depending on the semester, indicating the existence of different operational conditions for the tested buildings. A further comparison between RF trained with yearly and monthly data indicated that the energy usage prediction for educational buildings could be improved by taking into consideration their energy behavior changes during different semesters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Random forests for classification in ecology
Cutler, D. R., Edwards, T. C., Beard, K. H., Cutler, A., Hess, K. T., Gibson, J., & Lawler, J. J. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-0539.1 · Cited by 4,950
Hansen, L. K., & Salamon, P. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.58871 · Cited by 4,260
Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0016973 · Cited by 2,583
Cited by
Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103517 · Cited by 1,336
Deep learning models for solar irradiance forecasting: A comprehensive review
Kumari, P., & Toshniwal, D. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128566 · Cited by 445
A hybrid model for building energy consumption forecasting using long short term memory networks
Somu, N., M R, G. R., & Ramamritham, K. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114131 · Cited by 396
Pham, A.-D., Ngo, N.-T., Ha Truong, T. T., Huynh, N.-T., & Truong, N.-S. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121082 · Cited by 389
Khalil, M., McGough, A. S., Pourmirza, Z., Pazhoohesh, M., & Walker, S. (2022) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105287 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Zeng, R., Srinivasan, R. S., & Ahrentzen, S.
- Venue
- Energy and Buildings
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 171
- Pages
- 11-25
- ISSN
- 0378-7788 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2802491896
- Cited by
- 635
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 34.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Random Forest based hourly building energy prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.04.008
- The paper
- Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Zeng, R., Srinivasan, R. S., & Ahrentzen, S. (2018). Random Forest based hourly building energy prediction. Energy and Buildings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.04.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.