Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 73

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Model predictive control of distributed energy resources in residential buildings considering forecast uncertainties

Langner, Felix, Wang, Weimin, Frahm, Moritz, Hagenmeyer, Veit·2024·Energy and Buildings

Abstract

Forecast uncertainties pose a considerable challenge to the success of model predictive control (MPC) in buildings. Numerous possibilities for considering forecast uncertainties in MPCs are available, but an in-depth comparison is lacking. This paper compares two main approaches to consider uncertainties: robust and stochastic MPC. They are benchmarked against a deterministic MPC and an MPC with perfect forecast. The MPCs utilize a holistic building model to reflect modern smart homes that include photovoltaic power generation and storage, thermally controlled loads, and smart appliances. Real-world data are used to identify the thermal building model. The performance of the various controllers is investigated under three levels of uncertainty for two building models with different envelope performance. For the highly insulated building, the deterministic MPC achieves satisfactory thermal comfort when the forecast error is medium or low, but the thermal comfort is compromised for high forecast errors. In the poorly insulated building, thermal comfort is compromised at medium and high forecast errors. Compared to the deterministic MPC, the robust MPC increases the electricity cost by up to 4.5% and provides complete temperature constraint satisfaction while the stochastic MPC increases the electricity cost by less than 1% and fulfills the thermal comfort requirements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113753

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Metadata

Authors
Langner, F., Wang, W., Frahm, M., & Hagenmeyer, V.
Venue
Energy and Buildings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
303
Pages
113753
ISSN
0378-7788
Cited by
73
References
41
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte
  • Harold Grinspoon Foundation
  • Electric Power Research Institute
  • Helmholtz Association (37.12.01)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model predictive control of distributed energy resources in residential buildings considering forecast uncertainties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113753
The paper
Langner, F., Wang, W., Frahm, M., & Hagenmeyer, V. (2024). Model predictive control of distributed energy resources in residential buildings considering forecast uncertainties. Energy and Buildings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113753

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.