Impact of alternative fuels on the operational and environmental performance of a small turbofan engine
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SAF can lower emissions of soot, sulfur oxides, and ultrafine particles, and mitigate the climate impact of contrails.
“while also lowering emissions of other pollutants, such as soot [30], sulfur oxides, and ultrafine particles [31], as well as mitigating the climate impact of contrails [32].”
From Use of sustainable fuels in aviation: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [30]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Gaspar, R. M. P., & Sousa, J. M. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Sousa, J.M.M.
- Venue
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 130
- Pages
- 81-90
- ISSN
- 0196-8904 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2542211536
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Energy Conversion and Management (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/EMS/50022/2013)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat transfer and supercritical fluids
- Keywords
- alternative jet fuels, fuel blends, off-design operation, transient engine simulation, combustion effects, flame temperature, droplet evaporation, soot emissions, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, unburned hydrocarbons, engine performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
