Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 521

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigation of biomass torrefaction based on three major components: Hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin

Open access
Chen, Dengyu, Gao, Anjiang, Cen, Kehui, Zhang, Jie, Cao, Xiaobing, Ma, Zhongqing·2018·Energy Conversion and Management

Abstract

In this work, torrefaction of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin were studied at a series of torrefaction temperatures (210, 240, 270, and 300 °C) based on the properties of their three-phase products, namely solid, liquid (water and tar), and gaseous products. Among the three biomass components, significant difference of torrefaction characteristics was found due to their different molecular structures. For the solid product, hemicellulose presented lowest yield from 85.65% to 41.54% as the temperature increased because of the poor thermostability, thereby showing obvious variations in carbon and oxygen contents. For the gaseous product, CO2, followed by CO, were the dominant gaseous components in all torrefaction conditions including different feedstock and temperatures; also a small number of other components (H2 and CH4) were produced during torrefaction of lignin. The liquid product was composed of water and a small amount of tar. For the tar product, acids and ketones were the dominant components in the torrefaction of hemicellulose, while anhydrosugar in the torrefaction of cellulose, and phenols in the torrefaction of lignin. As the temperature increased from 210 °C to 300 °C, about 19.76–71.11%, 5.85–33.27%, and 16.28–44.89% of oxygen from hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin, respectively, was transformed into the liquid and gaseous products. Dehydration reaction and volatilization of the oxygenated gaseous product were the two dominant deoxygenation pathways, and the water, CO2, and CO were the dominant carriers of oxygen migration. In contrast to oxygen, only a small amount of carbon was transferred into tar product, followed by gaseous product, consequently the solid samples still retained most of the energy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.063

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 521

Metadata

Authors
Chen, D., Gao, A., Cen, K., Zhang, J., Cao, X., & Ma, Z.
Venue
Energy Conversion and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
169
Pages
228-237
ISSN
0196-8904 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803329393
Cited by
521
References
53
FWCI
20.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of biomass torrefaction based on three major components: Hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.063
The paper
Chen, D., Gao, A., Cen, K., Zhang, J., Cao, X., & Ma, Z. (2018). Investigation of biomass torrefaction based on three major components: Hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. Energy Conversion and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.063

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.