The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comprehensive review on hybrid power system for PEMFC-HEV: Issues and strategies
Abstract
Abstract Nowadays, there is a great shortage of non-renewable energy, and the environmental problems such as air pollution caused by automobile exhaust are very serious. The traditional fuel vehicle has been unable to meet the current human needs, so more and more people are concerned about the development of the hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). Based on proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is a new clean energy without pollution, PEMFC-HEV has a great potential for development. In this review, we have made a comprehensive research on energy management strategy (EMS) of the hybrid power system (HPS) for PEMFC-HEV in recent years. This paper focuses on the EMS of PEMFC as the main power source, the battery and the supercapacitor (SC) as the auxiliary energy in HEV. In this research, the classification of PEMFC-HEV is introduced in detail, and the advantages and disadvantages of various combinations of HPS are summarized. In addition, according to the different requirements and optimization targets of PEMFC-HEV, this paper makes a deep study of the current PEMFC-HEV hybrid system model, and the EMS developed by the researchers. Besides, the simulation and experimental results are compared with each other. From the perspective of strict evaluation, the existing technology can perform more or less. However, high efficiency and optimization performance still fail to achieve high goals. Therefore, the current problems and main control strategies of PEMFC-HEV are discussed and summarized, which is helpful for the development of PEMFC-HEV research in the future. The review will be expected to bring more efforts to the future development of PEMFC-HEV, including faster dynamic response, longer service lifetime, economic optimization, and high efficiency for the PEMFC system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Comprehensive Review on Supercapacitor Applications and Developments
Şahin, M., Blaabjerg, F., & Sangwongwanich, A. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15030674 · Cited by 679
The fuel cell electric vehicles: The highlight review
Pramuanjaroenkij, A., & Kakaç, S. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.103 · Cited by 469
Co-estimation of capacity and state-of-charge for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles
Li, X., Wang, Z., & Zhang, L. (2019) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.147 · Cited by 264
Review of energy storage systems for vehicles based on technology, environmental impacts, and costs
Balali, Y., & Stegen, S. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110185 · Cited by 260
Lu, D., Yi, F., Hu, D., Li, J., Yang, Q., & Wang, J. (2023) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121516 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Lü, X., Qu, Y., Wang, Y., Qin, C., & Liu, G.
- Venue
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 171
- Pages
- 1273-1291
- ISSN
- 0196-8904 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2810853782
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comprehensive review on hybrid power system for PEMFC-HEV: Issues and strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.065
- The paper
- Lü, X., Qu, Y., Wang, Y., Qin, C., & Liu, G. (2018). A comprehensive review on hybrid power system for PEMFC-HEV: Issues and strategies. Energy Conversion and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
