The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grid-connected hydrogen production via large-scale water electrolysis
Abstract
Abstract A techno-economic analysis was performed for large-scale hydrogen production plants (4000–40,000 kgH2/day or approximately 10–100 MW). Two electricity pricing schemes in 8 different geographical locations were considered. The analysis included five Canadian provinces with flat rates and real-time pricing for the wholesale markets in Germany, California, and Ontario. Under flat-rate pricing, the levelized cost of hydrogen produced via water electrolysis ranged from, for example, $4.21 to $4.71/kgH2 in Quebec. For wholesale electricity markets, an operational strategy was developed that aims to identify if a posted price is high or low based on historical electricity spot prices. The electricity cost can be reduced by 4%–9% in Germany and by 15%–31% in Ontario and California at a capacity factor of 0.9 by implementing such operational strategy. Electrolytic hydrogen production in Ontario combined with underground storage was found to be the cheapest in the three wholesale electricity markets, resulting in a levelized cost of hydrogen of $2.93–$3.22/kgH2 for alkaline electrolysis and $2.66–$3.54/kgH2 for proton exchange membrane electrolysis. Compared to steam methane reforming at $2.5–$2.8/kgH2 (without carbon capture), the electrolytic hydrogen cost is 6%–27% higher. However, this cost becomes comparable to that from steam methane reforming once carbon capture and storage are included in the analysis. Our results suggest that maximizing the use of the electrolytic systems via high capacity factors can be favorable, especially under integration with wholesale electricity markets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system
Staffell, I., Scamman, D., Velazquez Abad, A., Balcombe, P., Dodds, P. E., Ekins, P., Shah, N., & Ward, K. R. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee01157e · Cited by 4,187
Buttler, A., & Spliethoff, H. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003 · Cited by 2,510
Cited by
(2020) · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109620 · Cited by 1,160
Large-vscale hydrogen production and storage technologies: Current status and future directions
Olabi, A. G., bahri, A. S., Abdelghafar, A. A., Baroutaji, A., Sayed, E. T., Alami, A. H., Rezk, H., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.110 · Cited by 492
Jang, D., Kim, J., Kim, D., Han, W.-B., & Kang, S. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115499 · Cited by 328
Yates, J., Daiyan, R., Patterson, R., Egan, R., Amal, R., Ho-Baille, A., & Chang, N. L. (2020) · Cell Reports Physical Science · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100209 · Cited by 294
A review of hydrogen generation, storage, and applications in power system
Ge, L., Zhang, B., Huang, W., Li, Y., Hou, L., Xiao, J., Mao, Z., & Li, X. (2024) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2023.109307 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, T., Abdin, Z., Holm, T., & Mérida, W.
- Venue
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 200
- Pages
- 112108
- ISSN
- 0196-8904 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2979251830
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grid-connected hydrogen production via large-scale water electrolysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112108
- The paper
- Nguyen, T., Abdin, Z., Holm, T., & Mérida, W. (2019). Grid-connected hydrogen production via large-scale water electrolysis. Energy Conversion and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.