Measurement of waist circumference for retrospective studies – Prospective validation of use of CT images to assess abdominal circumference
Abstract
Introduction To validate the use of supine position and CT images for assessing abdominal circumference (AC). Method A prospective study in consecutive patients undergoing scheduled abdominal CT at our center between 17 and 25 September 2012. AC was measured four times: Measurements 1 and 2 were sequentially done by the same trained nurse before abdominal CT just above the iliac crest, while measurements 3 and 4 were done on the last abdominal CT slice not showing the iliac bone. Student's t tests and Q-Q and Bland-Altman plots were used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 102 patients were recruited. Mean age, 60 (35-78) years. Mean BMI, 25 (18-39) kg/m(2). Mean AC, 93.2 (73-135) cm. No significant differences were found between the four ACs measured (Student's t test, P=0.83). Q-Q and Bland-Altman plots showed good overlapping for the low and central values (73-110 cm) with a greater scatter for extremely high values. For the ellipse estimation, R(2) was 0.987 with a mean error of 0.4 cm and a stretch dispersion between 1.1 and -0.3 cm. Conclusion Supine (either measured or estimated on CT images by free hand elliptical ROI or ellipse formula) and standing measurements appear to be equivalent for abdominal circumferences <110 cm.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies tested the feasibility of obtaining waist circumference measurements from CT images by drawing a region of interest or by step-by-step image analysis, but those methods require time-consuming human intervention.
“Several previous studies [12, 13] have tested the feasibility of obtaining WC measurements from CT images by drawing a region of interest or by step-by-step image analysis; however, those methods require time-consuming human intervention.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 25
- Authors
- Ciudin, A., Salvador, R., Budoy, A., Ciudin, A., Spinu, C., Diaconu, M. G., Constantin, V., Sánchez, J., Nicolau, C., & Alcaraz, A.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
- Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Ciudin, Alexandru
- Venue
- Endocrinología y Nutrición
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 147-152
- ISSN
- 1575-0922 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977847441
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Endocrinología y Nutrición (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- waist circumference, abdominal circumference, abdominal CT, measurement agreement, obesity assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Body Weights and Measures, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Waist Circumference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review