Cited by 25Body Composition Measurement TechniquesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Measurement of waist circumference for retrospective studies – Prospective validation of use of CT images to assess abdominal circumference

Ciudin, Alexandru, Salvador, Rafael, Budoy, Alex, Ciudin, Andreea, Spinu, Cristina, Diaconu, Mihai Gabriel, Constantin, Vlad, Sánchez, Javier +2 more·2014·Endocrinología y Nutrición

Abstract

Introduction To validate the use of supine position and CT images for assessing abdominal circumference (AC). Method A prospective study in consecutive patients undergoing scheduled abdominal CT at our center between 17 and 25 September 2012. AC was measured four times: Measurements 1 and 2 were sequentially done by the same trained nurse before abdominal CT just above the iliac crest, while measurements 3 and 4 were done on the last abdominal CT slice not showing the iliac bone. Student's t tests and Q-Q and Bland-Altman plots were used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 102 patients were recruited. Mean age, 60 (35-78) years. Mean BMI, 25 (18-39) kg/m(2). Mean AC, 93.2 (73-135) cm. No significant differences were found between the four ACs measured (Student's t test, P=0.83). Q-Q and Bland-Altman plots showed good overlapping for the low and central values (73-110 cm) with a greater scatter for extremely high values. For the ellipse estimation, R(2) was 0.987 with a mean error of 0.4 cm and a stretch dispersion between 1.1 and -0.3 cm. Conclusion Supine (either measured or estimated on CT images by free hand elliptical ROI or ellipse formula) and standing measurements appear to be equivalent for abdominal circumferences <110 cm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.endonu.2013.10.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 25

Authors
Ciudin, A., Salvador, R., Budoy, A., Ciudin, A., Spinu, C., Diaconu, M. G., Constantin, V., Sánchez, J., Nicolau, C., & Alcaraz, A.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí (ES)
Corresponding author
Ciudin, Alexandru
Venue
Endocrinología y Nutrición
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
147-152
ISSN
1575-0922 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977847441
Cited by
25
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrinología y Nutrición (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
waist circumference, abdominal circumference, abdominal CT, measurement agreement, obesity assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Weights and Measures, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review