The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electricity consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Turkey
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This study investigates the causal relationship between electricity consumption and real GDP in Turkey during the period of 1950–2000. Both of the series were found to be a stationary process around a structural break by the Zivot and Andrews test. Thus, two different methodologies have been employed to test the Granger non-causality: the Dolado–Lutkepohl test using the VARs in levels, and the standard Granger causality test using the detrended data. Both tests have yielded a strong evidence for unidirectional causality running from the electricity consumption to the income. This implies that the supply of electricity is vitally important to meet the growing electricity consumption, hence to sustain the economic growth in Turkey.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Energy consumption and economic growth nexus in Tanzania: An ARDL bounds testing approach
Odhiambo, N. M. (2009) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.077 · Cited by 762
The relationship between GDP and electricity consumption in 10 Asian countries
Chen, S.-T., Kuo, H.-I., & Chen, C.-C. (2007) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.001 · Cited by 589
Metadata
- Authors
- Altinay, G., & Karagol, E.
- Venue
- Energy Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 849-856
- ISSN
- 0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059993735
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
