Role of natural gas in meeting an electric sector emissions reduction strategy and effects on greenhouse gas emissions
Open accessAbstract
With advances in natural gas extraction technologies, there is an increase in the availability of domestic natural gas, and natural gas is gaining a larger share of use as a fuel in electricity production. At the power plant, natural gas is a cleaner burning fuel than coal, but uncertainties exist in the amount of methane leakage occurring upstream in the extraction and production of natural gas. At higher leakage levels, the additional methane emissions could offset the carbon dioxide emissions reduction benefit of switching from coal to natural gas. This analysis uses the MARKAL linear optimization model to compare the carbon emissions profiles and system-wide global warming potential of the U.S. energy system over a series of model runs in which the power sector is required to meet a specific carbon dioxide reduction target across a number of scenarios in which the availability of natural gas changes. Scenarios are run with carbon dioxide emissions and a range of upstream methane emission leakage rates from natural gas production along with upstream methane and carbon dioxide emissions associated with production of coal and oil. While the system carbon dioxide emissions are reduced in most scenarios, total carbon dioxide equivalent emissions show an increase in scenarios in which natural gas prices remain low and, simultaneously, methane emissions from natural gas production are higher.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Carbon dioxide emissions from natural gas combustion are much lower than those from coal and fuel oil.
“Furthermore, as a clean energy source, the carbon dioxide emissions from its combustion are much lower than those of coal and fuel oil [49,50].”
From Prediction of Energy Consumption and Energy Savings in an Urban Vertical Farm Benchmark (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prediction of Energy Consumption and Energy Savings in an Urban Vertical Farm Benchmark
Xie, S., Martinez‐Vazquez, P., & Baniotopoulos, C. (2026) · Energy Science & Engineering · doi:10.1002/ese3.70415
- Authors
- Lenox, C., & Kaplan, P. O.
- Affiliations
- Environmental Protection Agency (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lenox, Carol
- Venue
- Energy Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 60
- Pages
- 460-468
- ISSN
- 0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7336527
- OpenAlex
- W2462726860
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Energy Economics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- EPA Air, Climate, and Energy (ACE)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
- Keywords
- natural gas, electricity generation, greenhouse gas emissions, methane leakage, CO2 emissions, global warming potential, natural gas prices, energy system modelling, MARKAL model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review