CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 236Energy, Environment, Economic GrowthEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesMarket Dynamics and Volatility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

The role of globalization in energy consumption: A quantile cointegrating regression approach

Shahbaz, Muhammad, Lahiani, Amine, Abosedra, Salah, Hammoudeh, Shawkat·2018·Energy Economics
DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.02.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.02.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 236

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Antweiler, 2001, Is free trade good for the environment?, Am. Econ. Rev., 91, 877, 10.1257/aer.91.4.877 · DOI
  2. Apergis, 2013, Is the energy-led growth hypothesis valid? New evidence from a sample of 85 countries, Energy Econ., 38, 24, 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.007 · DOI
  3. Cho, 2015, Quantile cointegration in the autoregressive distributed-lag modeling framework, J. Econ., 188, 281, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.05.003 · DOI
  4. Cole, 2006, Does trade liberalisation increase national energy use?, Econ. Lett., 92, 108, 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.01.018 · DOI
  5. Dedeoglu, 2013, Energy use, exports, imports and GDP: new evidence from the OECD countries, Energ. Policy, 57, 469, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.016 · DOI
  6. Dollar, 2004, Trade, growth and poverty, Econ. J., 114, 22, 10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00186.x · DOI
  7. Dreher, 2006, Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization, Appl. Econ., 38, 1091, 10.1080/00036840500392078 · DOI
  8. Hossain, 2012, Multivariate granger causality between economic growth, electricity consumption, exports and remittance for the panel of three SAARC countries, Glob. J. Manag. Bus. Res., 12, 40
  9. Lean, 2010, On the dynamics of aggregate output, electricity consumption and exports in Malaysia: evidence from multivariate Granger causality tests, Appl. Energy, 87, 1963, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.017 · DOI
  10. Narayan, 2009, Multivariate Granger causality between electricity consumption, exports and GDP: evidence from a panel of Middle Eastern countries, Energ. Policy, 37, 229, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.020 · DOI
  11. Nasreen, 2014, Causal relationship between trade openness, economic growth and energy consumption: a panel data analysis of Asian countries, Energ. Policy, 69, 82, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.009 · DOI
  12. Ozturk, 2010, A literature survey on energy-growth nexus, Energ. Policy, 38, 340, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.024 · DOI
  13. Ozturk, 2013, The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey, Energy Econ., 36, 262, 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.025 · DOI
  14. Sadorsky, 2011, Trade and energy consumption in the Middle East, Energy Econ., 33, 739, 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.12.012 · DOI
  15. Sadorsky, 2012, Energy consumption, output and trade in South America, Energy Econ., 34, 476, 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.12.008 · DOI
  16. Sami, 2011, Multivariate cointegration and causality between exports, electricity consumption and real income per capita: recent evidence from Japan, Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy, 1, 59
  17. Sbia, 2014, A contribution of foreign direct investment, clean energy, trade openness, carbon emissions and economic growth to energy demand in UAE, Econ. Model., 36, 191, 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.047 · DOI
  18. Shahbaz, 2012, Is energy consumption effective to spur economic growth in Pakistan? New evidence from bounds test to level relationships and Granger causality tests, Econ. Model., 29, 2310, 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.06.027 · DOI
  19. Shahbaz, 2013, Natural gas consumption and economic growth in Pakistan, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 18, 87, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.029 · DOI
  20. Shahbaz, 2013, The dynamic link between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis, Energy Econ., 40, 8, 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.06.006 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Shahbaz, 2014, Causality between trade openness and energy consumption: what causes what in high, middle and low-income countries, Energ. Policy, 70, 126, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.029 · DOI
  22. Shahbaz, 2016, The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India: implications for sustainable development, Energy Econ., 55, 52, 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.01.013 · DOI
  23. Shahbaz, 2018, How strong is the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption in developed economies? A country-specific and panel data analysis, Appl. Econ., 50, 1479, 10.1080/00036846.2017.1366640 · DOI
  24. Soytas, 2007, Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States, Ecol. Econ., 62, 482, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.009 · DOI
  25. Stern, 2007, The effect of NAFTA on energy and environmental efficiency in Mexico, Policy Stud. J., 35, 291, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00221.x · DOI
  26. Tsani, 2010, Energy consumption and economic growth: a causality analysis for Greece, Energy Econ., 32, 582, 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.09.007 · DOI
  27. Wang, 2011, CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China: a panel data analysis, Energ. Policy, 39, 4870, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.032 · DOI
  28. Wheeler, 2001, Racing to the bottom? Foreign investment and air pollution in developing countries, J. Environ. Dev., 10, 225, 10.1177/10704965-0101003-02 · DOI
  29. Xiao, 2009, Quantile cointegrating regression, J. Econ., 150, 248, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Zhang, 2013, Quantifying regional economic impacts of CO2 intensity targets in China, Energy Econ., 40, 687, 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.08.018 · DOI
  31. Zivot, 1992, Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10, 251, 10.1080/07350015.1992.10509904 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Shahbaz, M., Lahiani, A., Abosedra, S., & Hammoudeh, S.
Affiliations
  • MBS School of Business (FR)
  • Université d'Orléans (FR)
  • American University in the Emirates (AE)
Corresponding author
Lahiani, Amine
ORCID
Venue
Energy Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
71
Pages
161-170
ISSN
0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.eneco.2018.02.009
OpenAlex
W2788227409
Cited by
236
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3
FWCI
34.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Energy Economics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
Keywords
globalization, energy consumption, energy demand, capital, economic growth, Netherlands, Ireland, short-term and long-term effects, energy policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review