The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
Abstract
Abstract This paper investigates the effect of the green credit policy (GCP) on green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises (HPEs) using the promulgation of the “Green Credit Guidelines” (2012 Guidelines) policy in China as a quasi-natural experiment. The findings show that the 2012 Guidelines have had a positive and significant effect on the green patent output of HPEs, especially HPEs under stronger financial constraints. Furthermore, this positive effect occurred predominantly in HPEs with higher expected sunk costs or noncompliance costs, more intense product market competition, and state ownership. These results suggest that the GCP can stimulate green innovation in HPEs by exerting credit constraints, thus achieving green transformation in an emerging economy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics
Rennings, K. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00112-3 · Cited by 3,226
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- Amore, 2013, Credit supply and corporate innovation, J. Financ. Econ., 109, 835, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Bain, 1951, Relation of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing 1936-1940, Q. J. Econ., 65, 293, 10.2307/1882217 · DOI · Paper page
- Benfratello, 2008, Banks and innovation: micro econometric evidence on Italian firms, J. Financ. Econ., 90, 197, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Berrone, 2013, Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: institutional pressures and environmental innovations, Strateg. Manag. J., 34, 891, 10.1002/smj.2041 · DOI · Paper page
- Cai, 2020, Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies, Sci. Total Environ., 746, 140810, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140810 · DOI · Paper page
- Dong, 2020, Credit allocation, pollution, and sustainable growth: theory and evidence from China, Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade, 56, 2793, 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1528869 · DOI
- Duan, 2011, The paradox of green credit in China, Energy Procedia, 5, 1979, 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.340 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.340
- Fariñas, 2005, Firm productivity, heterogeneity, sunk costs and market selection, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 23, 505, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.02.002 · doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.02.002
- Feng, 2017, Does environmental policy reduce enterprise innovation? – evidence from China, Sustainability, 9, 872, 10.3390/su9060872 · DOI
- Ford, 2014, How environmental regulation affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: going beyond the Porter hypothesis, J. Clean. Prod., 84, 204, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.062 · DOI · Paper page
- Gollop, 1983, Environmental regulations and productivity growth: the case of fossil-fueled electric power generation, J. Polit. Econ., 91, 654, 10.1086/261170 · DOI · Paper page
- Gray, 2003, Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 46, 384, 10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00031-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Hadlock, 2010, New evidence on measuring financial constraints: moving beyond the KZ index, Rev. Financ. Stud., 23, 1909, 10.1093/rfs/hhq009 · DOI · Paper page
- He, 2018, Stand by or follow? Responsibility diffusion effects and green credit, Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade, 54, 1740, 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1430566 · DOI
- Holmstrom, 1989, Agency costs and innovation, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 12, 305, 10.1016/0167-2681(89)90025-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Hsu, 2014, Financial development and innovation: cross-country evidence, J. Financ. Econ., 112, 116, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Hu, 2017, How do different innovation forms mediate the relationship between environmental regulation and performance?, J. Clean. Prod., 161, 466, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.152 · DOI
- Hu, 2020, Quantity or quality? The impacts of environmental regulation on firms’ innovation-quasi-natural experiment based on China’s carbon emissions trading pilot, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 158, 120122, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120122 · DOI · Paper page
- Huang, 2021, Do politically connected CEOs promote Chinese listed industrial firms’ green innovation? The mediating role of external governance environments, J. Clean. Prod., 278, 123634, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123634 · DOI · Paper page
- Kang, 2020, The impact of green credit policy on manufacturers’ efforts to reduce suppliers’ pollution, J. Clean. Prod., 248, 119271, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119271 · DOI
- Kaplan, 1997, Do financing constraints explain why investment is correlated with cash flow?, Q. J. Econ., 112, 169, 10.1162/003355397555163 · DOI · Paper page
- Khan, 2019, Do financing constraints matter for technological and non-technological innovation? A (Re) examination of developing markets, Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade
- Li, 2018, Green loan and subsidy for promoting clean production innovation, J. Clean. Prod., 187, 421, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.066 · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, 2019, Green credit policy, property rights and debt financing: quasi-natural experimental evidence from China, Financ. Res. Lett., 29, 129, 10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.014 · DOI · Paper page
- Ming, 2020, COVID-19 and air quality: evidence from China, Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade, 56, 2422, 10.1080/1540496X.2020.1790353 · doi:10.1080/1540496x.2020.1790353
- Pizer, 2008, Endogenizing technological change: matching empirical evidence to modeling needs, Energy Econ., 30, 2754, 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.02.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Porter, 1995, Green and competitive: ending the stalemate, Harv. Bus. Rev., 73, 120
- Qi, 2018, Can environmental equity trading market induce green innovation? -- evidence based on green patent data of listed companies in China, Econ. Res., 53, 129
- Qin, 2020, COVID-19 pandemic and firm-level cash holding—moderating effect of goodwill and goodwill impairment, Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade, 56, 2243, 10.1080/1540496X.2020.1785864 · doi:10.1080/1540496x.2020.1785864
- Rubashkina, 2015, Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the Porter hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors, Energy Policy, 83, 288, 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014 · DOI · Paper page
- Shao, 2020, Environmental regulation and enterprise innovation: a review, Bus. Strateg. Environ., 29, 1465, 10.1002/bse.2446 · DOI
- Shen, 2020, The effect of environmental policy tools on regional green innovation: evidence from China, J. Clean. Prod., 254, 120122, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120122 · DOI
- Shi, 2018, Innovation suppression and migration effect: the unintentional consequences of environmental regulation, China Econ. Rev., 49, 1, 10.1016/j.chieco.2017.12.007 · DOI
- Shi, 2019, The effect of financing on firm innovation: multiple case studies on Chinese manufacturing enterprises, Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade, 55, 863, 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1478284 · DOI
- Shleifer, 1992, Liquidation values and debt capacity: a market equilibrium approach, J. Financ., 47, 1343, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04661.x · DOI · Paper page
- Song, 2020, Could environmental regulation and R&D tax incentives affect green product innovation?, J. Clean. Prod., 258, 1
- Stucki, 2018, How different policy instruments affect green product innovation: a differentiated perspective, Energy Policy, 114, 245, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.049 · DOI · Paper page
- Su, 2018, Does green credit affect the investment and financing of heavy polluting enterprises?, Financ. Res., 12, 123
- Tan, 2017, The transmission mechanism analysis of the impact of economic policy uncertainty on corporate investment, World Econ., 12, 3
- Wagner, 2007, On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: evidence from German manufacturing firms, Res. Policy, 36, 1587, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, 2019, Pollution haven or porter? The impact of environmental regulation on location choices of pollution-tensive firms in China, J. Environ. Manag., 248, 109248, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.019 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, 2020, The impact of carbon emissions trading on the directed technical change in China, J. Clean. Prod., 272, 122891, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122891 · DOI
- Xu, 2020, Asymmetric impacts of the policy and development of green credit on the debt financing cost and maturity of different types of enterprises in China, J. Clean. Prod., 264, 1
- Yan, 2020, Do renewable energy technology innovations promote China’s green productivity growth? Fresh evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient models, Energy Econ., 90, 104842, 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104842 · DOI · Paper page
- Yuan, 2018, Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: based on an extended CDM model, J. Clean. Prod., 176, 895, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.034 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhang, 2019, The effect of green finance on energy sustainable development: A case study in China, Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade
- Zhang, 2011, Tracking the implementation of green credit policy in China: top-down perspective and bottom-up reform, J. Environ. Manag., 92, 1321, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.12.019 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhang, 2020, Does green innovation mitigate financing constraints? Evidence from China’s private enterprises, J. Clean. Prod., 264, 121698, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121698 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhao, 2016, The influence of Chinese environmental regulation on corporate innovation and competitiveness, J. Clean. Prod., 112, 1228, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.029 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhu, 2019, Banks’ governance and innovation: evidence from the listed firms in China, Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade, 55, 2409, 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1483229 · DOI
Cited by
The impact of fintech innovation on green growth in China: Mediating effect of green finance
Zhou, G., Zhu, J., & Luo, S. (2022) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107308 · Cited by 638
Peng, H., Shen, N., Ying, H., & Wang, Q. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128044 · Cited by 412
Luo, S., Yu, S., & Zhou, G. (2021) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105335 · Cited by 194
Theoretical framework of sustainable value creation by companies. What do we know so far?
Zioło, M., Bąk, I., & Spoz, A. (2023) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2489 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, G., Wang, X., & Wang, Y.
- Venue
- Energy Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 98
- Pages
- 105134
- ISSN
- 0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123352605
- Cited by
- 787
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 106.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134
- The paper
- Hu, G., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.