Cited by 126Innovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsWireless Body Area Networks

Survey of energy scavenging for wearable and implantable devices

Open access
Ghomian, Taher, Mehraeen, Shahab·2019·Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.088

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 182 · Cited by 126

Authors
Ghomian, T., & Mehraeen, S.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ghomian, Taher
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
178
Pages
33-49
ISSN
0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2941219865
Cited by
126
References
182
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 5
FWCI
10.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
energy harvesting, wearable devices, biomedical implants, triboelectric nanogenerator, electromagnetic energy harvesting, electrostatic energy harvesting, self-powered devices, body heat, body movement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review