Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 36Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementMining and Gasification Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Technoeconomic analysis of a waste tire to liquefied synthetic natural gas (SNG) energy system

Open access

Abstract

Abstract Thermochemical conversion of solid wastes through gasification offers the dual benefit of production of high-value fuels and environmentally friendly waste disposal. In this paper, we propose a novel process for production of liquefied synthetic natural gas (SNG) from waste tires via a rotary kiln gasification process. We use a combination of experimental data available in the open literature, first principles mathematical models and empirical models to study three design cases (without CO 2 Capture and Sequestration (CCS), with precombustion CCS and with pre- and postcombustion CCS) in two locations (USA and Norway). The thermodynamic, economic and environmental performance of the concept is studied. The results show that minimum selling prices of 16.7, 17.5 and 19.9 $/GJLHV,SNG are required for USA and 20.9, 21.8 and 24.9 $/GJLHV,SNG for Norway. We note that these prices may become competitive under certain regulatory conditions (such as recent public policy movement in British Columbia, Canada requiring public utilities to purchase natural gas made from renewables at prices up to 30 $/GJLHV,SNG). The minimum selling price reduces substantially with process scale and with levying tipping fees. The design situated in Norway with both pre- and post-combustion CCS has near zero direct and indirect CO 2 emissions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117830

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Donatelli, 2010, High energy syngas production by waste tyres steam gasification in a rotary kiln pilot plant, Experimental and numerical investigations, Fuel, 89, 2721

Cited by

See all 36

Metadata

Authors
Subramanian, A. S. R., Gundersen, T., & Adams, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Adams, Thomas A.
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
205
Pages
117830
ISSN
0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3026891108
Cited by
35
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Energy (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Mining and Gasification Technologies
Keywords
CO2 capture and sequestration, waste-to-energy, techno-economic analysis, minimum selling price, tipping fees, CO2 emissions, process scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technoeconomic analysis of a waste tire to liquefied synthetic natural gas (SNG) energy system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117830
The paper
Subramanian, A. S. R., Gundersen, T., & Adams, T. A. (2020). Technoeconomic analysis of a waste tire to liquefied synthetic natural gas (SNG) energy system. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117830

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.