The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break
Abstract
Abstract China is the most polluted country in the world, facing the challenges of increased CO2 emissions and its ecological footprint. In order for China to achieve sustainable growth, it must identify factors that reduce environmental pollution and take essential measures before it is too late. To this end, this study empirically examines the ecological outcomes of income, human capital, globalization, renewable energy consumption, and trade openness for China within the framework of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis. The paper employs the recently developed augmented ARDL approach in the presence of one structural break to investigate annual time series data during the period 1980–2016. The findings reveal that the EKC hypothesis does not hold for China, and a U-shaped quadratic relationship between environmental pollution and income level has been determined for both CO2 emissions and ecological footprint. The results also suggest that globalization, trade openness, and income drive environmental pollution while increasing human capital reduces the ecological footprint in the long-term. No effects were found for renewable energy consumption. The study highlights that human capital plays a key role in reducing environmental degradation in China, while renewable energy is not sufficient to meet environmental requirements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913236 · Cited by 32,007
Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.616 · Cited by 20,385
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COINTEGRATION VECTORS
Johansen, S. (1988) · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3 · Cited by 17,027
Riti, J. S., Song, D., Shu, Y., & Kamah, M. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.117 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Jahanger, A., Usman, M., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102569 · Cited by 710
Does urbanization redefine the environmental Kuznets curve? An empirical analysis of 134 Countries
Wang, Q., Wang, X., & Li, R. (2022) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103382 · Cited by 458
Yuping, L., Ramzan, M., Xincheng, L., Murshed, M., Awosusi, A. A., BAH, S. I., & Adebayo, T. S. (2021) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.065 · Cited by 382
Pata, U. K., & Samour, A. (2022) · Progress in Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104249 · Cited by 382
Self-citationZhang, C., Khan, I., Dagar, V., Saeed, A., & Zafar, M. W. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121570 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Pata, U. K., & Caglar, A. E.
- Venue
- Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 216
- Pages
- 119220
- ISSN
- 0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3095694836
- Cited by
- 735
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 90.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119220
- The paper
- Pata, U. K., & Caglar, A. E. (2021). Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119220
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.