The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AdaBoost with SVM-based component classifiers
Abstract
The use of SVM (Support Vector Machine) as component classifier in AdaBoost may seem like going against the grain of the Boosting principle since SVM is not an easy classifier to train. Moreover, Wickramaratna et al. [2001. Performance degradation in boosting. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems, pp. 11-21] show that AdaBoost with strong component classifiers is not viable. In this paper, we shall show that AdaBoost incorporating properly designed RBFSVM (SVM with the RBF kernel) component classifiers, which we call AdaBoostSVM, can perform as well as SVM. Furthermore, the proposed AdaBoostSVM demonstrates better generalization performance than SVM on imbalanced classification problems. The key idea of AdaBoostSVM is that for the sequence of trained RBFSVM component classifiers, starting with large @s values (implying weak learning), the @s values are reduced progressively as the Boosting iteration proceeds. This effectively produces a set of RBFSVM component classifiers whose model parameters are adaptively different manifesting in better generalization as compared to AdaBoost approach with SVM component classifiers using a fixed (optimal) @s value. From benchmark data sets, we show that our AdaBoostSVM approach outperforms other AdaBoost approaches using component classifiers such as Decision Trees and Neural Networks. AdaBoostSVM can be seen as a proof of concept of the idea proposed in Valentini and Dietterich [2004. Bias-variance analysis of support vector machines for the development of SVM-based ensemble methods. Journal of Machine Learning Research 5, 725-775] that Adaboost with heterogeneous SVMs could work well. Moreover, we extend AdaBoostSVM to the Diverse AdaBoostSVM to address the reported accuracy/diversity dilemma of the original Adaboost. By designing parameter adjusting strategies, the distributions of accuracy and diversity over RBFSVM component classifiers are tuned to maintain a good balance between them and promising results have been obtained on benchmark data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms
Bradley, A. P. (1997) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(96)00142-2 · Cited by 7,217
Popular Ensemble Methods: An Empirical Study
Opitz, D., & Maclin, R. (1999) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.614 · Cited by 2,953
Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles and Their Relationship with the Ensemble Accuracy
Kuncheva, L. I., & Whitaker, C. J. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022859003006 · Cited by 2,335
KBA: kernel boundary alignment considering imbalanced data distribution
Wu, G., & Chang, E. Y. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2005.95 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, X., Wang, L., & Sung, E.
- Venue
- Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 785-795
- ISSN
- 0952-1976 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987859285
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 9.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AdaBoost with SVM-based component classifiers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.engappai.2007.07.001
- The paper
- Li, X., Wang, L., & Sung, E. (2008). AdaBoost with SVM-based component classifiers. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2007.07.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.