Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 98Color perception and designProduct Development and CustomizationMulti-Criteria Decision Making

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AI-based methodology of integrating affective design, engineering, and marketing for defining design specifications of new products

Open access
Kwong, C.K., Jiang, Huimin, Luo, X.G.·2016·Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
DOI 10.1016/j.engappai.2015.04.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the early stage of product design, particularly for consumer products, affective design, engineering, and marketing issues must be taken into considerationand they are commonly performed respectively by product designers, engineers, and marketing personnel. However, they have different concerns and focuses with regard to the new product design. Thus, these three processes are commonly conducted separately, leading to a sub-optimal and even sub-standard design. Such scenario indicates the need to incorporate the concerns of the three processes in the early stage of product design. However, no study has explored the incorporation of the concerns of the three processes into the product design. In this paper, an artificial intelligence (AI)-based methodology for integrating affective design, engineering, and marketing for defining design specifications of new products is proposed by which the concerns of the three processes can be considered simultaneously in the early design stage. The proposed methodology mainly involves development of customer satisfaction and cost models using fuzzy regression, generation of product utility functions using chaos-based fuzzy regression, formulation of a multi-objective optimization model and its solving using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II). A case study was conducted for electric iron design to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.engappai.2015.04.001

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kwong, C. K., Jiang, H., & Luo, X. G.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Kwong, C.K.
ORCID
Venue
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
47
Pages
49-60
ISSN
0952-1976 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.engappai.2015.04.001
OpenAlex
W569792995
Cited by
98
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
13.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Research Grant Council
  • Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (PolyU 517113)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Color perception and design
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Product Development and Customization
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Keywords
affective design, new product design, design specifications, customer satisfaction, cost model, fuzzy regression, multi-objective optimization, NSGA-II, early-stage product design, design integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.