Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 499

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lévy flight distribution: A new metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems

Houssein, Essam H., Saad, Mohammed R., Hashim, Fatma A., Shaban, Hassan, Hassaballah, M.·2020·Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we propose a new metaheuristic algorithm based on Levy flight called Levy flight distribution (LFD) for solving real optimization problems. The LFD algorithm is inspired from the Levy flight random walk for exploring unknown large search spaces (e.g., wireless sensor networks (WSNs). To assess the performance of the LFD algorithm, various optimization test bed problems are considered, namely the congress on evolutionary computation (CEC) 2017 suite and three engineering optimization problems: tension/compression spring, the welded beam, and pressure vessel. The statistical simulation results revealed that the LFD algorithm provides better results with superior performance in most tests compared to several well-known metaheuristic algorithms such as simulated annealing (SA), differential evolution (DE), particle swarm optimization (PSO), elephant herding optimization (EHO), the genetic algorithm (GA), moth-flame optimization algorithm (MFO), whale optimization algorithm (WOA), grasshopper optimization algorithm (GOA), and Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) algorithm. Furthermore, the performance of the LFD algorithm is tested on other different optimization problems of unknown large search spaces such as the area coverage problem in WSNs. The LFD algorithm shows high performance in providing a good deployment schema than energy-efficient connected dominating set (EECDS), A3, and CDS-Rule K topology construction algorithms for solving the area coverage problem in WSNs. Eventually, the LFD algorithm performs successfully achieving a high coverage rate up to 43.16 %, while the A3, EECDS, and CDS-Rule K algorithms achieve low coverage rates up to 40 % based on network sizes used in the simulation experiments. Also, the LFD algorithm succeeded in providing a better deployment schema than A3, EECDS, and CDS-Rule K algorithms and enhancing the detection capability of WSNs by minimizing the overlap between sensor nodes and maximizing the coverage rate. The source code is currently available for public from: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/76103-lfd .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103731

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Cited by

See all 499

Metadata

Authors
Houssein, E. H., Saad, M. R., Hashim, F. A., Shaban, H., & Hassaballah, M.
Venue
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
94
Pages
103731
ISSN
0952-1976 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036044602
Cited by
499
References
68
FWCI
26.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lévy flight distribution: A new metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103731
The paper
Houssein, E. H., Saad, M. R., Hashim, F. A., Shaban, H., & Hassaballah, M. (2020). Lévy flight distribution: A new metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103731

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.