Backdoor attacks and defenses in federated learning: Survey, challenges and future research directions
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Malicious actors often increase the persistence of backdoor attacks in FL by slowing down the learning rate during training.
“Therefore, malicious actors often increase the persistence of backdoor attacks in FL by slowing down the learning rate during training (Nguyen et al. 2024;Gong et al. 2022;Yang et al. 2023a).”
From Survey: federated learning data security and privacy-preserving in edge-Internet of Things (2024) · cites this paper as Nguyen et al. 2024
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 134 · Cited by 130
- Authors
- Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, T., Nguyen, P. L., Pham, H. H., Doan, K. D., & Wong, K.-S.
- Affiliations
- VinUniversity (VN)
- Trường Đại học Khoa học và Công nghệ Hà Nội (VN)
- Corresponding author
- Wong, Kok-Seng
- Venue
- Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-01
- Volume
- 127
- Pages
- 107166
- ISSN
- 0952-1976 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4387359750
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 134
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- backdoor attacks, federated learning, backdoor defense, data poisoning, malicious clients, model heterogeneity, privacy-preserving machine learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review