The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, and Application
Ewins, D. J. (1998) · Cited by 2,683
Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices
GUYAN, R. J. (1965) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.2874 · Cited by 2,642
Optimal sensor placement for fault detection
Worden, K., & Burrows, A. P. (2001) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/s0141-0296(00)00118-8 · Cited by 331
Optimal transducer placement for health monitoring of long span bridge
Heo, G., Wang, M. L., & Satpathi, D. (1997) · Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0267-7261(97)00010-9 · Cited by 163
Optimal sensor placement for modal identification using system-realization methods
Kammer, D. C. (1996) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/3.21688 · Cited by 109
Measurement of static flexibility matrices for experiments with incomplete reciprocity
Doebling, S. W., Peterson, L. D., & Alvin, K. F. (1995) · AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (SDM) · doi:10.2514/6.1995-1092 · Cited by 33
Sensor optimization using neural network sensitivity measures
Naimimohasses, R., Barnett, D. M., Green, D. A., et al. (1995) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/6/9/008 · Cited by 24
Oh, D.-Y., & No, H. C. (1994) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/0029-5493(94)90085-x · Cited by 23
Cited by
Optimization of sensor placement for structural health monitoring: a review
Ostachowicz, W., Soman, R., & Malinowski, P. (2019) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/1475921719825601 · Cited by 388
Computational methodologies for optimal sensor placement in structural health monitoring: A review
Tan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/1475921719877579 · Cited by 186
Structural damage detection-oriented multi-type sensor placement with multi-objective optimization
Lin, J.-F., Xu, Y.-L., & Law, S.-S. (2018) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2018.01.047 · Cited by 83
Optimal Sensor Placement for Structural Health Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review
Sun, Z., Mahmoodian, M., Sidiq, A., Jayasinghe, S., Shahrivar, F., & Setunge, S. (2025) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan14020022 · Cited by 53
“Among these variants is the EI-DPR technique, where modes in EI are weighted by the corresponding driving-point residues [139].”
InfluentialLi, J., Hao, H., & Chen, Z. (2017) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000550 · Cited by 44
Optimal sensor placement for damage detection of bridges subject to ship collision
Guo, Y. L., Ni, Y. Q., & Chen, S. K. (2017) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.1963 · Cited by 31
An Improved Genetic Algorithm for Optimal Sensor Placement in Space Structures Damage Detection
Beygzadeh, S., Salajegheh, E., Torkzadeh, P., Salajegheh, J., & Naseralavi, S. S. (2014) · International Journal of Space Structures · doi:10.1260/0266-3511.29.3.121 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Meo, M., & Zumpano, G.
- Venue
- Engineering Structures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1488-1497
- ISSN
- 0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171784600
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 35.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
