Cited by 115Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesStructural Engineering and Materials AnalysisUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hybrid health monitoring of prestressed concrete girder bridges by sequential vibration-impedance approaches

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kim et al. combined global vibration-based and local impedance-based approaches to distinguish girder damage and tendon damage for pre-stressed concrete girder bridges.

    “Kim et al. [275] combined global vibration-based and local impedance-based approaches to distinguish two typical damage types, namely, girder damage and tender damage, for pre-stressed concrete girder bridges.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Adams, 1978, A vibration technique for non-destructively assessing the integrity of structures, J Mech Eng Sci, 20, 93, 10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1978_020_016_02 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Stubbs, 1990, Global nondestructive damage evaluation in solids, Internat J Anal Exp Modal Anal, 5, 67
  3. Kim, 2006, Vibration-based damage monitoring in model plate-girder bridges under uncertain temperature conditions, Eng Struct, 29, 1354, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.07.024 · DOI
  4. Saiidi, 1994, Prestress force effect on vibration frequency of concrete bridges, J Struct Eng, 120, 2233, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:7(2233) · DOI
  5. Miyamoto, 2000, Behavior of prestressed beam strengthened with external tendons, J Struct Eng, 126, 1033, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:9(1033) · DOI
  6. Kim, 2003, Identification of prestress-loss in PSC beams using modal information, Struct Eng Mech, 17, 467
  7. Law, 2005, Time domain responses of a prestressed beam and prestress identification, J Sound Vibration, 288, 1011, 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.01.045 · DOI
  8. Abdel, 1999, Damage detection in bridges using modal curvatures: Application to a real damage scenario, J Sound Vibration, 226, 217, 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2295 · DOI
  9. Kim, 2003, Damage identification in beam-type structures: Frequency-based method vs. mode-shape-based method, Eng Struct, 25, 57, 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00118-9 · DOI
  10. Huth, 2005, Damage identification using modal data: Experiences on a prestressed concrete bridge, J Struct Eng, 131, 1898, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1898) · DOI
  11. Reda Taha, 2005, Damage identification for structural monitoring using fuzzy pattern recognition, Eng Struct, 27, 1774, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.018 · DOI
  12. Bhalla, 2003, Structural impedance based damage diagnosis by piezotransducers, Earthq Eng Struct Dynam, 32, 1897, 10.1002/eqe.307 · DOI
  13. Liang, 1994, An impedance method for dynamic analysis of active material systems, J Vibration Acoustics-Trans ASME, 116, 120, 10.1115/1.2930387 · DOI
  14. Park, 2000, Impedance-based health monitoring of civil structural components, J Infrastruct Syst-ASCE, 6, 153, 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2000)6:4(153) · DOI
  15. Kim, 2006, Hybrid health monitoring of structural joints using modal parameters and EMI signatures, Proc SPIE- Internat Soc Opt Eng, 6174
  16. Elsener, 2005, Long-term monitoring of electrically isolated post-tensioning tendons, Struct Concrete, 6, 101, 10.1680/stco.2005.6.3.101 · DOI
  17. Park, 2006, Multiple crack detection of concrete structures using impedance-based structural health monitoring techniques, Exp Mech, 46, 609, 10.1007/s11340-006-8734-0 · DOI
  18. Doebling, 1998, A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods, Shock Vibration Digest, 30, 91, 10.1177/058310249803000201 · DOI
  19. Zou, 2000, Vibration-based model-dependent damage (delamination) identification and health monitoring for composite structures — A review, J Sound Vibration, 230, 357, 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2624 · DOI
  20. Sohn H, Farrar CR, Hemez FM, Shunk DD, Stinemates DW, Nadler BR. A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001, Los Alamos National Report, LA-13976-MS; 2001
  21. Kessler SS. Piezoelectric-based in-situ damage detection of composite materials for structural health monitoring systems. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2002 · DOI
  22. Park, 2006, Performance assessment and validation of piezoelectric active-sensors in structural health monitoring, Smart Mater Struct, 15, 1673, 10.1088/0964-1726/15/6/020 · DOI
  23. Yi, 2004, Comparative study on modal identification methods using output-only information, Struct Eng Mech, 17, 445, 10.12989/sem.2004.17.3_4.445 · DOI
  24. Liang, 1994, An impedance method for dynamic analysis of active material systems, J Vibration Acoustics-Trans ASME, 116, 120, 10.1115/1.2930387 · DOI
  25. Kim, 2003, Nondestructive crack detection algorithm for full-scale bridges, J Struct Eng, ASCE, 129, 1358, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:10(1358) · DOI
  26. Brinker, 2001, Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition, Smart Mater Struct, 10, 441, 10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/303 · DOI
  27. Yang, 2008, Sensitivity of PZT impedance sensors for damage detection of concrete structures, Sensors, 8, 327, 10.3390/s8010327 · DOI
  28. Park, 2006, Multiple crack detection of concrete structures using impedance-based structural health monitoring techniques, Exp Mech, 46, 609, 10.1007/s11340-006-8734-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kim, J.-T., Park, J.-H., Hong, D.-S., & Park, W.-S.
Affiliations
  • Pukyong National University (KR)
  • Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jeong-Tae
Venue
Engineering Structures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
115-128
ISSN
0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084446635
Cited by
115
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
22.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Engineering Structures (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Keywords
prestressed concrete girder bridges, structural health monitoring, tendon injury, electromechanical impedance, damage detection, damage localization, damage extent estimation, damage classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review