CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51Vibration and Dynamic AnalysisVibration Control and Rheological FluidsSeismic Performance and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Numerical simulation on the effectiveness of using viscoelastic materials to mitigate seismic induced vibrations of above-ground pipelines

Bi, Kaiming, Hao, Hong·2016·Engineering Structures
DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.022
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adding a thin layer of viscoelastic material could significantly increase the damping of the pipe.

    “The results showed that even adding a thin layer of viscoelastic material could significantly increase the damping of the pipe.”

    From Vibration control of fluid-conveying pipes: a state-of-the-art review (2023) · cites this paper as [91]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Makar JM, Desnoyers R, McDonald SE. Failure modes and mechanisms in gray cast iron pipe. In: Proceedings of international conference on underground infrastructure research, Waterloo, Canada; 2001. p. 1–10.
  2. Lanzano, 2014, Seismic vulnerability of gas and liquid buried pipelines, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 28, 72, 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.03.010 · DOI
  3. Arjomandi, 2012, Bending capacity of sandwich pipes, Ocean Eng, 48, 17, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.09.014 · DOI
  4. Khalilpasha, 2013, Textured deep subsea pipelines, Int J Mech Sci, 68, 224, 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.019 · DOI
  5. Kumar, 2008, Passive control of vortex-induced vibrations: an overview, Recent Pat Mech Eng, 1, 1, 10.2174/2212797610801010001 · DOI
  6. Bi, 2016, Using pipe-in-pipe systems for subsea pipeline vibration control, Eng Struct, 109, 75, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.018 · DOI
  7. Norris MA, Ptak KR, Zamora BA, Hart JD. Implementation of tuned vibration absorbers for above ground pipeline vibration control. In: Proceedings of the international pipeline conference, Calgary, Canada; 2000 [IPC00-0270]. · DOI
  8. Powell, 1978, Seismic response analysis of above-ground pipelines, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 6, 157, 10.1002/eqe.4290060204 · DOI
  9. Anderson, 1975, Seismic behaviour of above-ground oil pipeline, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 3, 319, 10.1002/eqe.4290030403 · DOI
  10. Soliman, 1996, Response of overground pipelines to random ground motion, Eng Struct, 18, 537, 10.1016/0141-0296(95)00124-7 · DOI
  11. Lanzano, 2015, Seismic damage to pipelines in the framework of Na-Tech risk assessment, J Loss Prev Process Ind, 33, 159, 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.12.006 · DOI
  12. Soong, 2002, Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice, Eng Struct, 24, 246, 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00092-X · DOI
  13. Norris MA, Williams SL, Ptak KR, Mazzoleni AP, Hahn GD, Masson C. Passive vibration control treatment for subsea pipeline. In: Proceedings of offshore technology conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2013. Paper No. OTC24314. · DOI
  14. Saidi, 2011, Development of passive viscoelastic damper to attenuate excessive floor vibrations, Eng Struct, 33, 3317, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.017 · DOI
  15. Borges, 2014, A concept to reduce vibrations in steel catenary risers by the use of viscoelastic materials, Ocean Eng, 77, 1, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.12.004 · DOI
  16. Samali, 1995, Use of viscoelastic dampers in reducing wind- and earthquake-induced motion of building structures, Eng Struct, 17, 639, 10.1016/0141-0296(95)00034-5 · DOI
  17. Min, 2004, Vibration tests of 5-story steel frame with viscoelastic dampers, Eng Struct, 26, 831, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.02.004 · DOI
  18. Kerwin, 1959, Damping of flexural waves by a constrained viscoelastic layer, J Acoust Soc Am, 31, 952, 10.1121/1.1907821 · DOI
  19. Ross, 1959, Damping of plate flexural vibrations by means of viscoelastic laminate, Struct Damp Sect ASME, 3, 49
  20. Chen, 1999, Vibrations of a cylindrical shell with partially constrained layer damping (CLD) treatment, Int J Mech Sci, 41, 1485, 10.1016/S0020-7403(98)00102-7 · DOI
  21. Wang, 2004, Finite element dynamic analysis of orthotropic cylindrical shells with a constrained damping layer, Finite Elem Anal Des, 40, 737, 10.1016/S0168-874X(03)00112-4 · DOI
  22. Stutz LT, Magluta C, Roitman N, Silva RP. Experimental and numerical analysis of a sandwich beam with viscoelastic layer. In: Proceedings of the 20th international congress of mechanical engineering, Gramado, Brazil; 2009.
  23. Ruzzene, 1997, Natural frequencies and dampings identification using wavelet transform: application to real data, Mech Syst Signal Process, 11, 207, 10.1006/mssp.1996.0078 · DOI
  24. Tajimi H. A statistical method of determining the maximum response of a building structure during an earthquake. In: Proceedings of 2nd world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo; 1960. p. 781–96.
  25. Der Kiureghian, 1980, Structural response to stationary excitation, J Eng Mech Div, 106, 1195, 10.1061/JMCEA3.0002659 · DOI
  26. Bi, 2012, Modelling and simulation of spatially varying earthquake ground motions at sites with varying conditions, Probab Eng Mech, 29, 92, 10.1016/j.probengmech.2011.09.002 · DOI
  27. Bao, 2013, Integrated ARMA model method for damage detection of subsea pipeline system, Eng Struct, 48, 176, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.033 · DOI
  28. Ljunggren, 2002, Development of a new damper to reduce resonant vibrations in lightweight steel joist floors, Appl Acoust, 63, 1267, 10.1016/S0003-682X(02)00025-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bi, K., & Hao, H.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Bi, Kaiming
ORCID
Venue
Engineering Structures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
123
Pages
1-14
ISSN
0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.022
OpenAlex
W2409951380
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Engineering Structures (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DE150100195)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
Keywords
above-ground pipelines, seismic vibration control, viscoelastic damping, sandwich structures, material model calibration, earthquake frequency content, lifeline structures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review