The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Failure mode and effects analysis of RC members based on machine-learning-based SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach
Abstract
Abstract Machine learning approaches can establish the complex and non-linear relationship among input and response variables for the seismic damage assessment of structures. However, lack of explainability of complex machine learning models prevents their use in such assessment. This paper uses extensive experimental databases to suggest random forest machine learning models for failure mode predictions of reinforced concrete columns and shear walls, employs the recently developed SHapley Additive exPlanations approach to rank input variables for identification of failure modes, and explains why the machine learning model predicts a specific failure mode for a given sample or experiment. A random forest model established provides an accuracy of 84% and 86% for unknown data of columns and shear walls, respectively. The geometric variables and reinforcement indices are critical parameters that influence failure modes. The study also reveals that existing strategies of failure mode identification based solely on geometric features are not enough to properly identify failure modes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Machine Learning for Structural Engineering: A State-of-the-Art Review
Thai, H.-T. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 · Cited by 748
Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. (2022) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.103677 · Cited by 348
Hybrid Intelligence Failure Analysis for Industry 4.0: A Literature Review and Future Prospective
Mokhtarzadeh, M., Rodríguez-Echeverría, J., Semanjski, I., & Gautama, S. (2025) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-024-02376-5 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Mangalathu, S., Hwang, S.-H., & Jeon, J.-S.
- Venue
- Engineering Structures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 219
- Pages
- 110927
- ISSN
- 0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3035353528
- Cited by
- 1,071
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Failure mode and effects analysis of RC members based on machine-learning-based SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110927
- The paper
- Mangalathu, S., Hwang, S.-H., & Jeon, J.-S. (2020). Failure mode and effects analysis of RC members based on machine-learning-based SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110927
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.