The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carbon capture and storage
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies
Leung, D. Y. C., Caramanna, G., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 · Cited by 3,198
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Progress and trends in CO2 capture/separation technologies: A review
Mondal, M. K., Balsora, H. K., & Varshney, P. (2012) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.08.006 · Cited by 1,019
Constraints to Commercialization of Algal Fuels
Chisti, Y. (2013) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.07.020 · Cited by 719
Carbon capture and storage using alkaline industrial wastes
Bobicki, E. R., Liu, Q., Xu, Z., & Zeng, H. (2012) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2011.11.002 · Cited by 666
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbins, J., & Chalmers, H.
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4317-4322
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2948440321
- Cited by
- 1,088
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 81.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon capture and storage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.058
- The paper
- Gibbins, J., & Chalmers, H. (2008). Carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
