The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Twelve metropolitan carbon footprints: A preliminary comparative global assessment
Open accessAbstract
A dearth of available data on carbon emissions and comparative analysis between metropolitan areas make it difficult to confirm or refute best practices and policies. To help provide benchmarks and expand our understanding of urban centers and climate change, this article offers a preliminary comparison of the carbon footprints of 12 metropolitan areas. It does this by examining emissions related to vehicles, energy used in buildings, industry, agriculture, and waste. The carbon emissions from these sources—discussed here as the metro area's partial carbon footprint—provide a foundation for identifying the pricing, land use, help metropolitan areas throughout the world respond to climate change. The article begins by exploring a sample of the existing literature on urban morphology and climate change and explaining the methodology used to calculate each area's carbon footprint. The article then depicts the specific carbon footprints for Beijing, Jakarta, London, Los Angeles, Manila, Mexico City, New Delhi, New York, Sao Paulo, Seoul, Singapore, and Tokyo and compares these to respective national averages. It concludes by offering suggestions for how city planners and policymakers can reduce the carbon footprint of these and possibly other large urban areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jones, C., & Kammen, D. M. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4034364 · Cited by 498
Carbon accounting: a systematic literature review
Stechemesser, K., & Guenther, E. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.021 · Cited by 411
Air pollution and urban structure linkages: Evidence from European cities
Cárdenas Rodríguez, M., Dupont-Courtade, L., & Oueslati, W. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.190 · Cited by 296
Quantification of Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions on the Building/Street Scale for a Large U.S. City
Gurney, K. R., Razlivanov, I., Song, Y., Zhou, Y., Benes, B., & Abdul-Massih, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es3011282 · Cited by 263
Learning about urban climate solutions from case studies
Lamb, W. F., Creutzig, F., Callaghan, M. W., & Minx, J. C. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0440-x · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Sovacool, B. K., & Brown, M. A.
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4856-4869
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007141452
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twelve metropolitan carbon footprints: A preliminary comparative global assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.001
- The paper
- Sovacool, B. K., & Brown, M. A. (2010). Twelve metropolitan carbon footprints: A preliminary comparative global assessment. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.