The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework
Open accessAbstract
In this article we conceptualise energy use from a capabilities perspective, informed by the work of Amartya Sen, Martha Nussbaum and others following them. Building on this, we suggest a corresponding definition of energy poverty, as understood in the capabilities space. We argue that such an understanding provides a theoretically coherent means of comprehending the relationship between energy and wellbeing, and thus conceptualising energy deprivation, that makes sense across settings including both the global North and South: a coherence which has previously been lacking. At the same time, it has the flexibility to be deployed in a way that is sensitive to local contexts. Understanding energy use in the capabilities space also provides a means for identifying multiple sites of intervention, including some areas that are currently largely overlooked. We argue that this is advantageous for attempts to address energy poverty in the context of climate change and imperatives for the containment of aggregate energy consumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rethinking social recovery in schizophrenia: what a capabilities approach might offer
Hopper, K. (2007) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.012 · Cited by 296
Critiquing capabilities: The distractions of a beguiling concept
Dean, H. (2009) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0261018308101629 · Cited by 233 · cited 1×
“Concerns have also been raised as to whether such deliberation could be really inclusive, and not merely uphold the interests of the already powerful (Dean, 2009).”
BackgroundViggers, H., Howden-Chapman, P., Ingham, T., Chapman, R., Pene, G., Davies, C., Currie, A., Pierse, N., Wilson, H., Zhang, J., et al. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-176 · Cited by 29
Cited by
The political economy of car dependence: A systems of provision approach
Mattioli, G., Roberts, C., Steinberger, J. K., & Brown, A. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101486 · Cited by 620
Energy, Poverty, and Health in Climate Change: A Comprehensive Review of an Emerging Literature
Jessel, S., Sawyer, S., & Hernández, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00357 · Cited by 431
Awaworyi Churchill, S., & Smyth, R. (2020) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104663 · Cited by 386
Setting energy justice apart from the crowd: Lessons from environmental and climate justice
Jenkins, K. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.015 · Cited by 326
Energy poverty indicators: A critical review of methods
Herrero, S. T. (2017) · Indoor and Built Environment · doi:10.1177/1420326x17718054 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Day, R., Walker, G., & Simcock, N.
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 93
- Pages
- 255-264
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2303233065
- Cited by
- 764
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.019
- The paper
- Day, R., Walker, G., & Simcock, N. (2016). Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.