Cited by 231Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureSmart Grid Energy ManagementElectric Power System Optimization

The viability of vehicle-to-grid operations from a battery technology and policy perspective

Open access
Uddin, Kotub, Dubarry, Matthieu, Glick, Mark B.·2018·Energy Policy

Abstract

The idea that electric vehicles can connect to the electric grid to provide ancillary services, such as frequency regulation, peak shaving and spinning reserves is compelling, especially in jurisdictions where traditional forms of storage, back-up or peak supply are unavailable or expensive. Since conception, the economic viability of vehicle-to-grid operations has been the subject of debate. A common shortcoming of most of the previous studies has been a proper accounting of Lithium-ion battery degradation in the development of business models. Very recently, papers on the viability of V2G were published for which the detailed account of battery degradation resulted in what appeared to be two ostensibly contradictory conclusions. In this paper, the authors of these two major studies jointly reconcile their previous conclusions by providing clarity on how methodologies to manage battery degradation can reliably extend battery life. The paper also reviews the associated technology and policy implications of better managing battery use in vehicle and electrical grid applications. • V2G without consideration of battery degradation, on-line, is not viable. • Algorithms with objective of maximizing longevity can extend life of battery. • Establishing compensation model will be challenging and necessary for V2G to expand. • Establishing free market to aggregate and trade grid services will lead to V2G growth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 231

Authors
Uddin, K., Dubarry, M., & Glick, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Uddin, Kotub
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
113
Pages
342-347
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769948153
Cited by
231
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 9
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • EPSRC (EP/M507143/1, EP/N001745/1)
  • APRISES (N00014-13-1–0463)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
Keywords
vehicle-to-grid, electric vehicles, lithium-ion battery degradation, battery life, ancillary services, frequency regulation, peak shaving, spinning reserve, business models, compensation model, energy storage policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review