The viability of vehicle-to-grid operations from a battery technology and policy perspective
Open accessAbstract
The idea that electric vehicles can connect to the electric grid to provide ancillary services, such as frequency regulation, peak shaving and spinning reserves is compelling, especially in jurisdictions where traditional forms of storage, back-up or peak supply are unavailable or expensive. Since conception, the economic viability of vehicle-to-grid operations has been the subject of debate. A common shortcoming of most of the previous studies has been a proper accounting of Lithium-ion battery degradation in the development of business models. Very recently, papers on the viability of V2G were published for which the detailed account of battery degradation resulted in what appeared to be two ostensibly contradictory conclusions. In this paper, the authors of these two major studies jointly reconcile their previous conclusions by providing clarity on how methodologies to manage battery degradation can reliably extend battery life. The paper also reviews the associated technology and policy implications of better managing battery use in vehicle and electrical grid applications. • V2G without consideration of battery degradation, on-line, is not viable. • Algorithms with objective of maximizing longevity can extend life of battery. • Establishing compensation model will be challenging and necessary for V2G to expand. • Establishing free market to aggregate and trade grid services will lead to V2G growth.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 231
- Authors
- Uddin, K., Dubarry, M., & Glick, M. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Uddin, Kotub
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 113
- Pages
- 342-347
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2769948153
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Energy Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- EPSRC (EP/M507143/1, EP/N001745/1)
- APRISES (N00014-13-1–0463)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Keywords
- vehicle-to-grid, electric vehicles, lithium-ion battery degradation, battery life, ancillary services, frequency regulation, peak shaving, spinning reserve, business models, compensation model, energy storage policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review