CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 47

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Willingness to pay for microgrids to enhance community resilience

Hotaling, Chelsea, Bird, Stephen, Heintzelman, Martin D.·2021·Energy Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112248
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112248

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Abbey, 2014, Powering through the storm: microgrids operation for more efficient disaster recovery, IEEE Power Energy Mag., 12, 67, 10.1109/MPE.2014.2301514 · DOI
  2. Abdullah, 2010, Choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to improve electricity services, Energy Pol., 38, 4570, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.012 · DOI
  3. Aizaki, 2012, Basic functions for supporting an implementation of choice experiments in R, J. Stat. Software, 50, 1, 10.18637/jss.v050.c02 · DOI
  4. Arriaga, 2014, Northern lights: access to electricity in Canada's northern and remote communities, IEEE Power Energy Mag., 12, 50, 10.1109/MPE.2014.2317963 · DOI
  5. Asgary, 2012, Willingness to pay for enhancing local emergency preparedness programmes: evidences from Canada, Int. J. Emerg. Manag., 8, 168, 10.1504/IJEM.2012.046020 · DOI
  6. Bae, 2018, Increasing consumer participation rates for green pricing programs: a choice experiment for South Korea, Energy Econ., 74, 490, 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.027 · DOI
  7. Baik, 2018, Providing limited local electric service during a major grid outage: a first assessment based on customer willingness to pay, Risk Anal., 38, 272, 10.1111/risa.12838 · DOI
  8. Baik, 2020, Estimating what US residential customers are willing to pay for resilience to large electricity outages of long duration, Nature Energy, 5, 250, 10.1038/s41560-020-0581-1 · DOI
  9. Bech, 2005, Effects coding in discrete choice experiments, Health Econ., 14, 1079, 10.1002/hec.984 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bertakis, 2000, Gender differences in the utilization of health Care services, J. Fam. Pract., 49, 147
  11. Bhat, 1998, Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel mode choice modeling, Transport. Res., 32, 495
  12. Bifaretti, 2017, Grid-connected microgrids to support renewable energy sources penetration, Energy Procedia, 105, 2910, 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.658 · DOI
  13. Bird, 2017, Multi-stakeholder microgrids for resilience and sustainability, Environ. Hazards, 16, 116, 10.1080/17477891.2016.1263181 · DOI
  14. Birol, 2006, Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: the case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece, Ecol. Econ., 60, 145, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.002 · DOI
  15. Borchers, 2007, Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source?, Energy Pol., 35, 3327, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.009 · DOI
  16. Breetz, 2018, The political logics of clean energy transitions, Bus. Polit., 20, 492, 10.1017/bap.2018.14 · DOI
  17. Brownstone, 1998, Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns, J. Econom., 89, 109, 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00057-8 · DOI
  18. Burger, 2018, Duke Energy proposes new microgrid and $500M energy storage investment, Microgrid Knowledge
  19. Carlsson, 2008, Does it matter when a power outage occurs? A choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to avoid power outages, Energy Econ., 30, 1232, 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.04.001 · DOI
  20. Che, 2014, Only connect: microgrids for distribution system restoration, IEEE Power Energy Mag., 12, 70, 10.1109/MPE.2013.2286317 · DOI
  21. Cherp, 2018, Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: a meta-theoretical framework, Energy Res. Social Sci., 37, 175, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.015 · DOI
  22. DeWaters, 2011, Energy literacy of secondary students in New York State (USA): a measure of knowledge, affect, and behavior, Energy Pol., 39, 1699, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.049 · DOI
  23. Dobes, 2015, Post-cyclone emergency services: a cost–benefit analysis for Cairns, Australia, Nat. Hazards, 75, 869, 10.1007/s11069-014-1355-5 · DOI
  24. Donahue, 2006, Experience, attitudes, and willingness to pay for public safety, Am. Rev. Publ. Adm., 36, 395, 10.1177/0275074005285666 · DOI
  25. Fathallah, 2020, Addressing gender in energy studies, Energy Res. Social Sci., 65, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101461 · DOI
  26. Gholami, 2016, Front lines against the darkness: enhancing the resilience of the electricity grid through microgrid facilities, IEEE Electrification Magazine, 4, 18, 10.1109/MELE.2015.2509879 · DOI
  27. Gromet, 2013, Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110, 9314, 10.1073/pnas.1218453110 · DOI
  28. Gosling, 2003, A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains, J. Res. Pers., 37, 504, 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Guerin, 2000, Occupant predictors of household energy behavior and consumption change as found in energy studies since 1975, Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J., 29, 48, 10.1177/1077727X00291003 · DOI
  30. Hensher, 2014, Willingness to pay for residential electricity supply quality and reliability, Appl. Energy, 115, 280, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.007 · DOI
  31. Hensher, 2003, The Mixed Logit model: the state of practice, Transportation, 30, 133, 10.1023/A:1022558715350 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Hirsch, 2018, Microgrids: a review of technologies, key drivers, and outstanding issues, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 90, 402, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.040 · DOI
  33. Hole, 2007, A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures, Health Econ., 16, 827, 10.1002/hec.1197 · DOI
  34. Hole, 2007, Estimating mixed logit models using maximum simulated likelihood, STATA J., 7, 388, 10.1177/1536867X0700700306 · DOI
  35. Hole, 2012, Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions: a comparison of models in preference and WTP space using data from a health-related choice experiment, Empir. Econ., 42, 445, 10.1007/s00181-011-0500-1 · DOI
  36. Kenward, 2014, Blackout: extreme weather, climate change and power outages, Clim. Central, 10
  37. Knoefel, 2018, A consumer perspective on corporate governance in the energy transition: evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Germany, Energy Econ., 75, 440, 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.025 · DOI
  38. Lancaster, 1966, A new approach to consumer theory, J. Polit. Econ., 74, 132, 10.1086/259131 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Loomis, 1996, Improving validity experiments of contingent valuation methods: results of efforts to reduce the disparity of hypothetical and actual willingness to pay, Land Econ., 450, 10.2307/3146908 · DOI
  40. Loomis, 2014, 2013 WAEA keynote address: strategies for overcoming hypothetical bias in stated preference surveys, J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 34
  41. McFadden, 1974, The measurement of urban travel demand, J. Publ. Econ., 3, 303, 10.1016/0047-2727(74)90003-6 · DOI
  42. Mitra, 2008, Distributed generation and microgrids for small island electrification in developing countries: a review, Solar Energy Soc. India, 18, 6
  43. Morrison, 2002, Choice modeling and tests of benefit transfer, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 84, 161, 10.1111/1467-8276.00250 · DOI
  44. Morrissey, 2018, The cost of electric power outages in the residential sector: a willingness to pay approach, Appl. Energy, 212, 141, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.007 · DOI
  45. Narayanan, 2012, Sustaining critical social services during extended regional power blackouts, Risk Anal., 32, 1183, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01726.x · DOI
  46. Oparaocha, 2011, Gender and energy for sustainable development, Current Opin. Environ. Sustain. Energy Syst., 3, 265, 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.07.003 · DOI
  47. Ozbafli, 2016, Estimating the willingness to pay for reliable electricity supply: a choice experiment study, Energy Econ., 56, 443, 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.03.025 · DOI
  48. Panteli, 2015, The grid: stronger, bigger, smarter? Presenting a conceptual framework of power system resilience, IEEE Power Energy Mag., 13, 58, 10.1109/MPE.2015.2397334 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Panteli, 2015, Influence of extreme weather and climate change on the resilience of power systems: impacts and possible mitigation strategies, Elec. Power Syst. Res., 127, 259, 10.1016/j.epsr.2015.06.012 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Pepermans, 2011, The value of continuous power supply for Flemish households, Energy Pol., 39, 7853, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.032 · DOI
  51. Rommel, 2017, Preferences for micro-cogeneration in Germany: policy implications for grid expansion from a discrete choice experiment, Appl. Energy, 206, 612, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.216 · DOI
  52. Rose, 2013, Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments, Transportation, 40, 1021, 10.1007/s11116-013-9451-z · DOI
  53. Scarpa, 2010, Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: primary and discretionary choice of British households' for micro-generation technologies, Energy Econ., 32, 129, 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.004 · DOI
  54. Sherman, 2016, Motivational orientation explains the link between political ideology and proenvironmental behavior, Ecopsychology, 8, 239, 10.1089/eco.2016.0029 · DOI
  55. Stadler, 2016, Value streams in microgrids: a literature review, Appl. Energy, 162, 980, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.081 · DOI
  56. Ton, 2012, The US department of energy's microgrid initiative, Electr. J., 25, 84, 10.1016/j.tej.2012.09.013 · DOI
  57. Vossler, 2013, Understanding the consequences of consequentiality: testing the validity of stated preferences in the field, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 86, 137, 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.007 · DOI
  58. Whitehead, 2007, Willingness to pay for a green energy program: a comparison of ex-ante and ex-post hypothetical bias mitigation approaches, Resour. Energy Econ., 29, 247, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2006.10.001 · DOI
  59. Wood, 2017, Utility microgrids make progress in Arizona and Ohio, Microgrid Knowledge
  60. Wood, 2018, ComEd's much-watched Bronzeville microgrid wins key backing, Microgrid Knowledge
  61. Wood, 2018, How vital is reliable power? Puerto Rico's 4,465 deaths offer an answer, Microgrid Knowledge
  62. Wood, 2018, Microgrid benefits: eight ways a microgrid will improve your Operation…and the world, Microgrid Knowledge
  63. Xie, 2018, Willingness to pay for green electricity in Tianjin, China: based on the contingent valuation method, Energy Pol., 114, 98, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.067 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 47

Metadata

Authors
Hotaling, C., Bird, S., & Heintzelman, M. D.
ORCID
Heintzelman, Martin D.
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
154
Pages
112248
ISSN
0301-4215
DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112248
Cited by
47
References
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • New York State Energy Research Development Authority
  • National Science Foundation
  • Division of Industrial Innovation and Partnerships (1534035, 41309)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review