Cited by 68Hybrid Renewable Energy SystemsEnergy Law and PolicyRenewable Energy and Sustainability

Incentive structures for power-to-X and e-fuel pathways for transport in EU and member states

Open access
Skov, Iva Ridjan, Schneider, Noémi·2022·Energy Policy

Abstract

Though Power-to-X pathways, primarily Power-to-Liquids, attract interest as solutions for decarbonising parts of the transport sector that are not suitable for electrification, the regulatory framework until recently slowed down their implementation. This paper examines the updates in the main aspects of the legal framework in the European Union from 2019 to the beginning of 2022 related to Power-to-X: support schemes, specific targets, and potential barriers. The results show increasing interest and market entrance of electrolysis and push from the different actors and regulatory parties to establish solutions that will enable faster upscaling. However, it is visible from the National Energy and Climate Plans and hydrogen strategies that the most emphasis is still on hydrogen as an end fuel for personal vehicles or power-to-gas. On the other hand, few countries have implemented legal frameworks facilitating diverse PtX pathways without focusing solely on hydrogen. Nevertheless, revisions of RED II have finally set up specific targets for electrofuels and Fit for 55 has introduced new actions supporting electrofuels in aviation and marine transport.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113121

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mere challenge of securing large volumes of energy and feedstock is an obstacle to industry growth and can be a major source of reluctance to invest.

    “Thus, the mere challenge of securing large volumes of energy and feedstock is an obstacle to industry growth [12] and can be a major source of reluctance to invest [37].”

    From Locked in on RFNBOs – Will EU mandates for drop-in synthetic aviation fuels lead to decreased energy- and cost-efficiency? (2026) · cites this paper as [37]

    Section 3, “Support schemes and potential barriers” (page unavailable), says that connecting PtX units to renewable electricity has caused investment hesitance because of connection costs and difficulty assuring that the electricity qualifies as renewable. Section 5, “Discussion” (page unavailable), also identifies a need to expand renewable-electricity capacity alongside PtX plants. The paper does not establish that securing large volumes of both energy and feedstock is a major cause of reluctance to invest. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 68

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Dragan, D., 2021. Polish Hydrogen Strategy -regulatory challenges in the European perspective. Polityka Energetyczna -Energy Policy Journal 24, 19-32.
  2. Edwards, R.L., Font-Palma, C., Howe, J., 2021. The status of hydrogen technologies in the UK: a multi-disciplinary review. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 43.
  3. Falcone, P.M., Hiete, M., Sapio, A., 2021. Hydrogen economy and sustainable development goals: review and policy insights. Current Opinion Green Sustain. Chem. 31. Federal Ministry Republic of Austria, 2018. The Hydrogen Initiative.
  4. Parra, D., Valverde, L., Pino, F.J., Patel, M.K., 2019. A review on the role, cost and value of hydrogen energy systems for deep decarbonisation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 101, 279-294.
  5. Ridjan, I., Mathiesen, B.V., Connolly, D., 2015. Terminology used for renewable liquid and gaseous fuels based on the conversion of electricity: a review. J. Clean. Prod.
  6. Wulf, C., Zapp, P., Schreiber, A., 2020. Review of power-to-X demonstration projects in Europe. Front. Energy Res. 8, 191.

Authors
Skov, I. R., & Schneider, N.
Affiliations
Aalborg University (DK)
Corresponding author
Skov, Iva Ridjan
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
168
Pages
113121
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283331458
Cited by
68
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Danish Energy Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Energy Law and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable Energy and Sustainability
Keywords
power-to-X, power-to-liquids, e-fuels, electrofuels, transport decarbonization, regulatory framework, incentive structures, electrolysis, National Energy and Climate Plan, hydrogen strategy, Renewable Energy Directive II, Fit for 55, EU member states

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review