The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cyclic carbonate for highly stable cycling of high voltage lithium metal batteries
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The lithium metal battery (LMB) is one of the most promising next-generation battery systems due to its ultrahigh energy density. However, problematic dendrite formation and low Coulombic efficiency (CE) greatly limit its practical application. Carbonate electrolyte solvents are still indispensable for the operation of LMBs using a transition metal oxide cathode. We determined the impact of different cyclic carbonates, which actively participate in the formation of the solid-electrolyte interface (SEI), on the stable cycling of LMBs using a nickel-rich layered cathode LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2 (NMC622). The substitution of fluorine atoms in the cyclic carbonate profoundly enhances the stability of the lithium metal anode while fluoroalkyl and alkoxy substituents are detrimental. Cyclic carbonate trans-difluoroethylene carbonate (DFEC) was identified as a novel SEI enabler on the lithium metal anode, facilitating the formation of a protective SEI with relatively high lithium fluoride content. A Li/NMC622 cell utilizing DFEC electrolyte solvent as SEI enabler displayed a capacity retention larger than 82% after 400 cycles and an average CE of 99.95%. In contrast, the cycling retention after 400 cycles for a Li/NMC622 cell using monofluoroethylene carbonate was only 31% with an average CE of 99.73%. Other fluoroalkyl or alkoxy cyclic carbonates do not provide improved stabilization of the lithium metal anode over ethylene carbonate. The fundamental studies in this work provide critical insight for the further development of advanced electrolytes in LMBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode
Qian, J., Henderson, W. A., Xu, W., Bhattacharya, P., Engelhard, M., Borodin, O., & Zhang, J.-G. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7362 · Cited by 2,561
Cited by
A Growing Appreciation for the Role of LiF in the Solid Electrolyte Interphase
Tan, J., Matz, J., Dong, P., Shen, J., & Ye, M. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202100046 · Cited by 1,019
High-voltage liquid electrolytes for Li batteries: progress and perspectives
Fan, X., & Wang, C. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00450f · Cited by 980
Lithium metal anodes: Present and future
Wang, R., Cui, W., Chu, F., & Wu, F. (2020) · Journal of Energy Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2019.12.024 · Cited by 544
Confronting the Challenges in Lithium Anodes for Lithium Metal Batteries
Wang, Q., Liu, B., Shen, Y., Wu, J., Zhao, Z., Zhong, C., & Hu, W. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202101111 · Cited by 531
Critical effects of electrolyte recipes for Li and Na metal batteries
Zheng, X., Huang, L., Ye, X., Zhang, J., Min, F., Luo, W., & Huang, Y. (2021) · Chem · doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2021.02.025 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Su, C.-C., He, M., Amine, R., Chen, Z., Sahore, R., Dietz Rago, N., & Amine, K.
- Venue
- Energy Storage Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 17
- Pages
- 284-292
- ISSN
- 2405-8289 (ISSN-L)
- 2405-8297
- OpenAlex
- W2901425286
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cyclic carbonate for highly stable cycling of high voltage lithium metal batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.11.003
- The paper
- Su, C.-C., He, M., Amine, R., Chen, Z., Sahore, R., Dietz Rago, N., & Amine, K. (2019). Cyclic carbonate for highly stable cycling of high voltage lithium metal batteries. Energy Storage Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.11.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.