The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graphite as anode materials: Fundamental mechanism, recent progress and advances
Abstract
Abstract Graphite is a perfect anode and has dominated the anode materials since the birth of lithium ion batteries, benefiting from its incomparable balance of relatively low cost, abundance, high energy density, power density, and very long cycle life. Recent research indicates that the lithium storage performance of graphite can be further improved, demonstrating the promising perspective of graphite and in future advanced LIBs for electric vehicles and grid-scale energy storage stations. However, to obtain graphite electrodes with higher performance, it is essential to deeply understand the fundamentals of graphite and Li-graphite intercalation compounds (GICs), especially their crystal and electronic structures, and thus to regulate the structure to boost the kinetics of Li ion intercalation, storage, and diffusion in graphite. We introduce the crystal and electronic properties of pristine graphite and Li-GICs, specifically focusing on the development of theoretical calculations and their application in elucidating the band structure, stages, and phase stabilities of graphite and Li-GIC. Based on these fundamental aspects, the experimental researches on thermodynamics/kinetics, including electrochemical potential and Li diffusion rate of graphite anodes, are reviewed. Several key challenges and issues towards advanced graphite anodes with superior rate/capacity/cycle performances are discussed. In addition, advances of graphite and related materials for Na+/K+ storage are briefly summarized. Finally, we propose a series of promising strategies to improve the performance of graphite and recommend several research directions towards rational graphite anode design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 · Cited by 75,638
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S., & Krieg, H. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3382344 · Cited by 59,686
Hohenberg, P., & Kohn, W. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b864 · Cited by 53,541
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteries
Goodenough, J. B., & Kim, Y. (2010) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm901452z · Cited by 10,943
Phospho‐olivines as Positive‐Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
Padhi, A. K., Nanjundaswamy, K. S., & Goodenough, J. B. (1997) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1837571 · Cited by 7,933
Li-ion battery materials: present and future
Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J. T., & Yushin, G. (2015) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 · Cited by 7,389
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Yang, Y., Ren, D., Wang, L., & He, X.
- Venue
- Energy Storage Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 147-170
- ISSN
- 2405-8289 (ISSN-L)
- 2405-8297
- OpenAlex
- W3114292463
- Cited by
- 1,011
- References
- 123
- FWCI
- 25.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graphite as anode materials: Fundamental mechanism, recent progress and advances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.027
- The paper
- Zhang, H., Yang, Y., Ren, D., Wang, L., & He, X. (2021). Graphite as anode materials: Fundamental mechanism, recent progress and advances. Energy Storage Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.