Cited by 5Advanced oxidation water treatmentToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Potential effect of atmospheric condition on incident light and photo-production of reactive intermediates in freshwater systems

Open access
Albi, Luthfia Shofi, Guo, Zhongyu, Chen, Guo, Yoshimura, Chihiro·2023·Environmental Advances

Abstract

The effect of local atmospheric conditions on aquatic photochemical reactions has been rarely explored because of the difficulty in field observation. Thus, this study aimed to elucidate the effects of atmospheric conditions, which are inorganic air pollution, aerosol pollution, and ozone layer depletion, on the incident light and photo-production of reactive intermediates (RIs). Models of SMARTS (Simple Model for the Atmospheric Radiative Transfer of Sunshine) and APEX (Aqueous Photochemistry of Environmentally occurring Xenobiotics) were used to simulate the changes in wavelength profile and steady-state concentrations of RIs, which are hydroxyl radical, carbonate radical, singlet oxygen, and triplet-state of dissolved organic matter. Results showed that inorganic air pollution and aerosol pollution have a reduction effect on the production of RIs, while ozone layer depletion increases the production of RIs. Among them, inorganic air pollution has the largest influence on the production of RIs which were expected to reduce by 80%–90% in extreme pollution. This study also investigated the potential effect of water constituents (i.e., NO3−, dissolved organic matter, and HCO3−) on the relation between atmospheric conditions and the production of RIs. NO3− concentration under different atmospheric conditions showed the most influence on the production of RIs. This study highlighted the importance of considering atmospheric conditions when assessing the photochemical persistence of organic pollutants. Even though these results are model output, they quantitatively revealed the potential influence of atmospheric conditions on the production of RIs in freshwater systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envadv.2023.100346

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albi, L. S., Guo, Z., Chen, G., & Yoshimura, C.
Affiliations
Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Yoshimura, Chihiro
Venue
Environmental Advances
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
11
Pages
100346
ISSN
2666-7657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4317666106
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21H01462, 22KJ1302)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
atmospheric conditions, incident light, reactive intermediates, aerosol pollution, ozone depletion, hydroxyl radicals, carbonate radical, singlet oxygen, nitrate, bicarbonate, freshwater ecosystems, radiative transfer modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review