The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Priority and emerging flame retardants in rivers: Occurrence in water and sediment, Daphnia magna toxicity and risk assessment
Open accessAbstract
The occurrence, partitioning and risk of eight polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), nine new brominated (NBFRs) and ten organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) were evaluated in three Spanish rivers suffering different anthropogenic pressures (Nalón, Arga and Besòs). OPFRs were ubiquitous contaminants in water (ΣOPFRs ranging from 0.0076 to 7.2μgL(-1)) and sediments (ΣOPFRs ranging 3.8 to 824μgkg(-1)). Brominated flame retardants were not detected in waters, whereas ΣPBDEs ranged from 88 to 812μgkg(-1) and decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE) reached 435μgkg(-1) in sediments from the River Besòs, the most impacted river. The occurrence of flame retardants in river water and sediment was clearly associated with human activities, since the highest levels occurred near urban and industrial zones and after wastewater treatment plants discharge. Daphnia magna toxicity was carried out for OPFRs, the most ubiquitous flame retardants, considering individual compounds and mixtures. Toxicity of nine tested OPFRs differed largely among compounds, with EC50 values ranging over three magnitude orders (0.31-381mgL(-1)). Results evidenced that these compounds act by non-polar narcosis, since their toxicity was proportional to their lipophilicity (Kow). Furthermore, their joint toxicity was additive, which means that single and joint toxicity can be predicted knowing their concentration levels in water using quantitative structure activity relationships (QSARs) and predictive mixture models. Based on these results, a risk assessment considering joint effect was performed calculating and summing risk quotients (RQs) for the water and sediment samples. No significant risk to D. magna (ΣRQs <1) was observed for any of the monitored rivers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organophosphate flame retardants and plasticisers in wastewater treatment plants
Meyer, J., & Bester, K. (2004) · Journal of Environmental Monitoring · doi:10.1039/b403206c · Cited by 292
Seasonal fluctuations of organophosphate concentrations in precipitation and storm water runoff
Regnery, J., & Püttmann, W. (2010) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.12.027 · Cited by 87
Cited by
Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers: Sources, occurrence, toxicity and human exposure
Wei, G.-L., Li, D.-Q., Zhuo, M.-N., Liao, Y.-S., Xie, Z.-Y., Guo, T.-L., Li, J.-J., Zhang, S.-Y., & Liang, Z.-Q. (2015) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2014.09.012 · Cited by 1,299
Shi, Y., Gao, L., Li, W., Wang, Y., Liu, J., & Cai, Y. (2016) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.11.008 · Cited by 313
Kim, U.-J., & Kannan, K. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b00727 · Cited by 274
Schreder, E. D., & La Guardia, M. J. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es502227h · Cited by 264
Greaves, A. K., & Letcher, R. J. (2017) · Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00128-016-1898-0 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Cristale, J., García Vázquez, A., Barata, C., & Lacorte, S.
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 59
- Pages
- 232-243
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021157503
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Priority and emerging flame retardants in rivers: Occurrence in water and sediment, Daphnia magna toxicity and risk assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2013.06.011
- The paper
- Cristale, J., García Vázquez, A., Barata, C., & Lacorte, S. (2013). Priority and emerging flame retardants in rivers: Occurrence in water and sediment, Daphnia magna toxicity and risk assessment. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.06.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.