Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Assessing the risk of an excess fluoride intake among Swedish children in households with private wells — Expanding static single-source methods to a probabilistic multi-exposure-pathway approach

Augustsson, Anna, Berger, Tobias·2014·Environment International

Abstract

It is often assumed that water consumption is the major route of exposure for fluoride and analysis of water fluoride content is the most common approach for ensuring that the daily intake is not too high. In the present study, the risk of excess intake was characterized for children in households with private wells in Kalmar County, Sweden, where the natural geology shows local enrichments in fluorine. By comparing water concentrations with the WHO drinking water guideline (1.5 mg/L), it was found that 24% of the ca. 4800 sampled wells had a concentration above this limit, hence providing a figure for the number of children in the households concerned assessed to be at risk using this straightforward approach. The risk of an excess intake could, alternatively, also be characterized based on a tolerable daily intake (in this case the US EPA RfD of 0.06 mg/kg-day). The exposure to be evaluated was calculated using a probabilistic approach, where the variability in all exposure factors was considered, again for the same study population. The proportion of children assessed to be at risk after exposure from drinking water now increased to 48%, and when the probabilistic model was adjusted to also include other possible exposure pathways; beverages and food, ingestion of toothpaste, oral soil intake and dust inhalation, the number increased to 77%. Firstly, these results show how the risk characterization is affected by the basis of comparison. In this example, both of the refere…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Baelum, 1987, Daily dose of fluoride and dental fluorosis, Tandlaegebladet, 91, 452
  2. Bassin, 2006, Age-specific fluoride exposure in drinking water and osteosarcoma (United States), Cancer Causes Control, 17, 421, 10.1007/s10552-005-0500-6 · DOI
  3. Binkowitz, 2001, Disparity in quantitative risk assessment: a review of input distributions, Risk Anal, 21, 75, 10.1111/0272-4332.211091 · DOI
  4. Boldemann, 2006, Impact of preschool environment upon children's physical activity and sun exposure, Prev Med, 42, 301, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.12.006 · DOI
  5. Bruun, 1988, Dentifrice usage among Danish children, J Dent Res, 67, 1114, 10.1177/00220345880670081001 · DOI
  6. Burt, 1992, The changing patterns of systemic fluoride intake, J Dent Res, 71, 1228, 10.1177/00220345920710051601 · DOI
  7. Chavoshi, 2011, Health risk assessment of fluoride exposure in soil, plants, and water at Isfahan, Iran, Hum Ecol Risk Assess, 17, 414, 10.1080/10807039.2011.552397 · DOI
  8. Choi, 2012, Developmental fluoride neurotoxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Environ. Health Perspect., 120, 1362, 10.1289/ehp.1104912 · DOI
  9. Clark, 1994, Trends in prevalence of dental fluorosis in North America, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 22, 148, 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb01832.x · DOI
  10. Dean, 1942, Domestic water and dental caries, Publ Health Rep, 57, 1155, 10.2307/4584182 · DOI
  11. Edmunds, 2013, Chapter 13: fluoride in natural waters, 311
  12. EFSA NDA Panel (EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies), 2013, Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for fluoride, EFSA J, 11, 3332, 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3332 · DOI
  13. Erdal, 2005, A qualitative look at fluorosis, fluoride exposure, and intake in children using a health risk assessment approach, Environ Health Perspect, 113, 111, 10.1289/ehp.7077 · DOI
  14. Farkas, 1974, Potential effect of food processing on the fluoride content of infant foods, Sci Total Environ, 2, 399, 10.1016/0048-9697(74)90006-0 · DOI
  15. Featherstone, 1999, Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 27, 31, 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb01989.x · DOI
  16. Fejerskov, 1987, Combined effect of systemic and topical fluoride treatments on human deciduous teeth — case studies, Caries Res, 21, 452, 10.1159/000261051 · DOI
  17. Filipsson, 2011, Variability and uncertainty in Swedish exposure factors for use in quantitative exposure assessments, Risk Anal, 31, 108, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01464.x · DOI
  18. Fordyce, 2007, A health risk assessment for fluoride in central Europe, Environ Geochem Health, 29, 83, 10.1007/s10653-006-9076-7 · DOI
  19. Grandjean, 2014, Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity, Lancet Neurol, 13, 330, 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70278-3 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hamilton, 1992, Water fluoridation: a risk assessment perspective, J Environ Health, 54, 27
  21. Hodge, 1950, The concentration of fluorides in drinking water to give the point of minimum caries with maximum safety, J Am Dent Assoc, 40, 436, 10.14219/jada.archive.1950.0062 · DOI
  22. Indermitte, 2009, Exposure to high fluoride drinking water and risk of dental fluorosis in Estonia, Int J Environ Res, 6, 710
  23. Jackson, 2002, The fluoride content of foods and beverages from negligibly and optimally fluoridated communities, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 30, 382, 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.00002.x · DOI
  24. Jha, 2011, Site specific toxicological risk from fluoride exposure through ingestion of vegetables and cereal crops in Unnao district, Uttar Pradesh, India, Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 74, 940, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.01.002 · DOI
  25. Lahermo, 1991, The occurrence and geochemistry of fluorides in natural waters in Finland and East-Africa with reference to their geomedical implications, J Geochem Explor, 41, 65, 10.1016/0375-6742(91)90075-6 · DOI
  26. Larsen, 1971, Soil fluorine, J Soil Sci, 22, 210, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1971.tb01608.x · DOI
  27. Lester, 2007, Site-specific applications of probabilistic health risk assessment: review of the literature since 2000, Risk Anal, 27, 635, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00890.x · DOI
  28. Levy, 1994, Review of fluoride exposures and ingestion, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 22, 173, 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb01836.x · DOI
  29. Levy, 2001, Patterns of fluoride intake from birth to 36months, J Public Health Dent, 61, 70, 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2001.tb03369.x · DOI
  30. McClure, 1943, Ingestion of fluoride and dental caries. Quantitative relations based on food and water requirements of children 1 to 12years old, Am J Dis Child, 66, 362, 10.1001/archpedi.1943.02010220015002 · DOI
  31. McDonagh, 2000, Systematic review of water fluoridation, Br Med J, 321, 855, 10.1136/bmj.321.7265.855 · DOI
  32. Miziara, 2009, Fluoride ingestion from food items and dentifrice in 2–6-year-old Brazilian children living in a fluoridated area using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 37, 305, 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2009.00477.x · DOI
  33. Naccache, 1990, Variability in the ingestion of toothpaste by preschool children, Caries Res, 24, 359, 10.1159/000261296 · DOI
  34. Naccache, 1992, Factors affecting the ingestion of fluoride dentifrice by children, J Public Health Dent, 52, 222, 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1992.tb02277.x · DOI
  35. Ophaug, 1985, Dietary fluoride intake of 6-month and 2-year-old children in 4 dietary regions of the United States, Am J Clin Nutr, 42, 701, 10.1093/ajcn/42.4.701 · DOI
  36. Petersen, 2004, Effective use of fluorides for the prevention of dental caries in the 21st century: the WHO approach, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 32, 319, 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00175.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. Pettersson, 1999, Daily intake of copper from drinking water among young children in Sweden, Environ Health Perspect, 107, 441, 10.1289/ehp.99107441 · DOI
  38. Prystupa, 2011, Fluorine — a current literature review. An NRC and ATSDR based review of safety standards for exposure of fluorine and fluorides, Toxicol Mech Methods, 21, 103, 10.3109/15376516.2010.542931 · DOI
  39. Rango, 2012, Groundwater quality and its health impact: an assessment of dental fluorosis in rural inhabitants of the Main Ethiopian Rift, Environ Int, 43, 37, 10.1016/j.envint.2012.03.002 · DOI
  40. Riordan, 1991, Dental fluorosis and fluoride exposure in western Australia, J Dent Res, 70, 1022, 10.1177/00220345910700070101 · DOI
  41. Sander, 2006, Uncertain numbers and uncertainty in the selection of input distributions — consequences for a probabilistic risk assessment of contaminated land, Risk Anal, 26, 1363, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00808.x · DOI
  42. Schulman, 1995, The average daily dose of fluoride: a model based on fluid consumption, Pediatr Dent, 17, 13
  43. Simard, 1989, The ingestion of fluoride dentifrice by young children, J Dent Child, 56, 177
  44. Tabari, 2000, Dental fluorosis in permanent incisor teeth in relation to water fluoridation, social deprivation and tooth-paste use in infancy, Br Dent J, 189, 216, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800726 · DOI
  45. Van den Berg, 1994, Human exposure to soil contamination: a qualitative and quantitative analysis towards proposal for human toxicological intervention values (partly revised edition)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Augustsson, A., & Berger, T.
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
68
Pages
192-199
ISSN
0160-4120
Cited by
45
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review