The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ganga water pollution: A potential health threat to inhabitants of Ganga basin
Abstract
BACKGROUND The water quality of Ganga, the largest river in Indian sub-continent and life line to hundreds of million people, has severely deteriorated. Studies have indicated the presence of high level of carcinogenic elements in Ganga water. OBJECTIVES We performed extensive review of sources and level of organic, inorganic pollution and microbial contamination in Ganga water to evaluate changes in the level of various pollutants in the recent decade in comparison to the past and potential health risk for the population through consumption of toxicant tainted fishes in Ganga basin. METHODS A systematic search through databases, specific websites and reports of pollution regulatory agencies was conducted. The state wise level of contamination was tabulated along the Ganga river. We have discussed the major sources of various pollutants with particular focus on metal/metalloid and pesticide residues. Bioaccumulation of toxicants in fishes of Ganga water and potential health hazards to humans through consumption of tainted fishes was evaluated. RESULTS The level of pesticides in Ganga water registered a drastic reduction in the last decade (i.e. after the establishment of National Ganga River Basin Authority (NGRBA) in 2009), still the levels of some organochlorines are beyond the permissible limits for drinking water. Conversely the inorganic pollutants, particularly carcinogenic elements have increased several folds. Microbial contamination has also significantly increased. Hazard quotient and hazard index indicated significant health risk due to metal/metalloid exposure through consumption of tainted fishes from Ganga. Target cancer risk assessment showed high carcinogenic risk from As, Cr, Ni and Pb as well as residues of DDT and HCHs. CONCLUSION Current data analysis showed that Ganga water quality is deteriorating day by day and at several places even in upper stretch of Ganga the water is not suitable for domestic uses. Although there is positive impact of ban on persistent pesticides with decreasing trend of pesticide residues in Ganga water, the increasing trend of trace and toxic elements is alarming and the prolong exposure to polluted Ganga water and/or consumption of Ganga water fishes may cause serious illness including cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vega, M., Pardo, R., Barrado, E., & Debán, L. (1998) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(98)00138-9 · Cited by 1,011
Pesticide use and application: An Indian scenario
Abhilash, P. C., & Singh, N. (2009) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.061 · Cited by 883
Toxic hazards of leather industry and technologies to combat threat: a review
Dixit, S., Yadav, A., Dwivedi, P. D., & Das, M. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.017 · Cited by 588
Vijgen, J., Abhilash, P. C., Li, Y. F., Lal, R., Forter, M., Torres, J., Singh, N., Yunus, M., Tian, C., Schäffer, A., et al. (2011) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-010-0417-9 · Cited by 432
Water Pollution with Special Reference to Pesticide Contamination in India
Agrawal, A., Pandey, R. S., & Sharma, B. (2010) · Journal of Water Resource and Protection · doi:10.4236/jwarp.2010.25050 · Cited by 403
Global Status of DDT and Its Alternatives for Use in Vector Control to Prevent Disease
van den Berg, H. (2009) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.0900785 · Cited by 376 · cited 1×
“DDT is still in use for public health and sanitation purpose as per WHO guidelines and HCH was in use until 2013 for termite control in buildings, wood and agriculture (Berg, 2009; Central Insecticide Board and Registration Committee, 2012).”
MethodGupta, A., Rai, D. K., Pandey, R. S., & Sharma, B. (2009) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0547-4 · Cited by 318
Bhuiyan, M. A. H., Suruvi, N. I., Dampare, S. B., Islam, M. A., Quraishi, S. B., Ganyaglo, S., & Suzuki, S. (2011) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1557-6 · Cited by 286
Sankararamakrishnan, N., Kumar Sharma, A., & Sanghi, R. (2005) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.08.001 · Cited by 249
Wasim Aktar, M., Paramasivam, M., Ganguly, M., Purkait, S., & Sengupta, D. (2010) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0688-5 · Cited by 191
Cited by
An extensive review on the consequences of chemical pesticides on human health and environment
Rani, L., Thapa, K., Kanojia, N., Sharma, N., Singh, S., Grewal, A. S., Srivastav, A. L., & Kaushal, J. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124657 · Cited by 1,427
Ahmad, M. F., Ahmad, F. A., Alsayegh, A. A., Zeyaullah, M., AlShahrani, A. M., Muzammil, K., Saati, A. A., Wahab, S., Elbendary, E. Y., Kambal, N., et al. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29128 · Cited by 624
Retracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Dwivedi, S., Mishra, S., & Tripathi, R. D.
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 117
- Pages
- 327-338
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2803985255
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 9.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ganga water pollution: A potential health threat to inhabitants of Ganga basin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2018.05.015
- The paper
- Dwivedi, S., Mishra, S., & Tripathi, R. D. (2018). Ganga water pollution: A potential health threat to inhabitants of Ganga basin. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.05.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.