A conceptual framework for the environmental surveillance of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance
Open accessAbstract
Environmental surveillance of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance could contribute toward the protection of human, animal and ecosystem health. However, justification for the choice of markers and sampling sites that informs about different risk scenarios is often lacking. Here, we define five fundamentally different objectives for surveillance of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in the environment. The first objective is (1) to address the risk of transmission of already antibiotic-resistant bacteria to humans via environmental routes. The second is (2) to address the risk for accelerating the evolution of antibiotic resistance in pathogens through pollution with selective agents and bacteria of human or animal origin. The third objective is (3) to address the risks antibiotics pose for aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem health, including the effects on ecosystem functions and services. The two final objectives overlap with those of traditional clinical surveillance, namely, to identify (4) the population-level resistance prevalence and (5) population-level antibiotic use. The latter two environmental surveillance objectives have particular potential in countries where traditional clinical surveillance data and antibiotic consumption data are scarce or absent. For each objective, the levels of evidence provided by different phenotypic and genotypic microbial surveillance markers, as well as antibiotic residues, are discussed and evaluated on a conceptual level. Furthermore, sites where monitoring would be particularly informative are identified. The proposed framework could be one of the starting points for guiding environmental monitoring and surveillance of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance on various spatiotemporal scales, as well as for harmonizing such activities with existing human and animal surveillance systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Environmental surveillance of feces-impacted sites has recently been proposed as a method for assessing community-level prevalence of AMR.
“Alternatively, environmental surveillance of feces-impacted sites has recently been proposed as a method for assessing community-level prevalence of AMR 116 .”
From Urban informal settlements as hotspots of antimicrobial resistance and the need to curb environmental transmission. (2020) · cites this paper as [116]
For estimates of population-level antibiotic use based on environmental samples, the partitioning of antibiotic residues between solid and aqueous phases may be difficult to estimate.
“For estimates of population-level antibiotic use based on environmental samples, the partitioning of antibiotic residues between solid and aqueous phases would also have to be accounted for and this parameter may be difficult to estimate 116 .”
From Urban informal settlements as hotspots of antimicrobial resistance and the need to curb environmental transmission. (2020) · cites this paper as [116]
Cites
Antibiotic resistance is ancient
D’Costa, V. M., King, C. E., Kalan, L., Morar, M., Sung, W. W. L., Schwarz, C., Froese, D., Zazula, G., Calmels, F., Debruyne, R., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10388 · Cited by 2,720 · see citing works
The shared antibiotic resistome of soil bacteria and human pathogens
Forsberg, K. J., Reyes, A., Wang, B., Selleck, E. M., Sommer, M. O. A., & Dantas, G. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1220761 · Cited by 1,650 · see citing works
Bell, B. G., Schellevis, F., Stobberingh, E., Goossens, H., & Pringle, M. (2014) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-13 · Cited by 1,262 · see citing works
Karkman, A., Pärnänen, K., & Larsson, D. G. J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07992-3 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nadimpalli, M. L., Marks, S. J., Montealegre, M. C., Gilman, R. H., Pajuelo, M. J., Saito, M., Tsukayama, P., Njenga, S. M., Kiiru, J., Swarthout, J., et al. (2020) · Nature microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-020-0722-0 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huijbers, P. M. C., Flach, C.-F., & Larsson, D. G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Larsson, D.G. Joakim
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 130
- Pages
- 104880
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2949826334
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environment International (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
- Västra Götalandsregionen
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Keywords
- environmental surveillance, antibiotics, antibiotic resistance, conceptual framework, transmission of resistant bacteria, antibiotic resistance evolution, ecosystem health, antibiotic residues, sampling sites, resistance prevalence, antibiotic use
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Drug Resistance, Bacterial
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review