Corrigendum to “Multi-pathway human exposure assessment of phthalate esters and DINCH” [Environ. Int. 112 (2018) 115–126]
Open accessAbstract
The authors regret that in the original research paper entitled "Multi-pathway human exposure assessment of phthalate esters and DINCH" published in Environment International 112 (2018): 115-126 some of the units for the water solubility shown in Table 1 are wrong, which affects the intake estimations for the dermal uptake via air.The water solubility values depicted in Schwarzenbach (2005) did not show clear units, which led us to an erroneous calculation of permeability coefficient (k pg ) values.Therefore, water solubility and vapor pressure values are now replaced by EPISUITE estimations of the Henry's law a Estimated using EPISuite Version 4.1.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dermal uptake is very modest for high molecular weight phthalates.
“Dermal uptake is very modest for high molecular weight phthalates (Giovanoulis et al., 2020), as our DEHP results confirm”
From Human skin absorption of three phthalates (2024) · cites this paper as Giovanoulis et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human skin absorption of three phthalates
Hopf, N. B., De Luca, H. P., Borgatta, M., Koch, H. M., Pälmke, C., Benedetti, M., Berthet, A., & Reale, E. (2024) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2024.05.016 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Giovanoulis, G., Bui, T., Xu, F., Papadopoulou, E., Padilla-Sanchez, J. A., Covaci, A., Haug, L. S., Palm Cousins, A., Magnér, J., Cousins, I. T., & de Wit, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
- IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Giovanoulis, Georgios
- ORCID
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 143
- Pages
- 106071
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3082726616
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environment International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
- Keywords
- phthalates, DINCH, human exposure assessment, water solubility, vapor pressure, permeability coefficient
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
