The DOI matches its Crossref record; 153 of the 153 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microalgae-based technology for antibiotics removal: From mechanisms to application of innovational hybrid systems
Open accessAbstract
Antibiotics contamination is an emerging environmental concern, owing to its potential risks to ecosystems and human health. Microalgae-based technology has been widely reported as a promising alternative to conventional wastewater treatment, since it is a solar-power driven, ecologically friendly, cost-effective, and sustainable reclamation strategy. This review provides fundamental insights into the major mechanisms underpinning microalgae-based antibiotics removal, including bioadsorption, bioaccumulation, and biodegradation. The critical role of extracellular polymeric substances on bioadsorption and extracellular biodegradation of antibiotics are also covered. Moreover, this review sheds light on the important factors affecting the removal of antibiotics by microalgae, and summarizes several novel approaches to improve the removal efficiency, including acclimation, co-metabolism and microbial consortium. Besides, hybrid systems (such as, microalgae-based technologies combined with the conventional activated sludge, advanced oxidation processes, constructed wetlands, and microbial fuel cells), and genetic engineering are also recommended, which will be feasible for enhanced removal of antibiotics. Finally, this review also highlights the need for further studies aimed at optimizing microalgae-based technology, with emphasis on improving performance and expanding its application in large-scale settings, especially in terms of technical, environmental-friendly and economically competitiveness. Overall, this review summarizes current understanding on microalgae-based technologies for removal of antibiotics and outlines future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antibiotics in the aquatic environment – A review – Part I
Kümmerer, K. (2009) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.086 · Cited by 4,475
Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals
Van Boeckel, T. P., Brower, C., Gilbert, M., Grenfell, B. T., Levin, S. A., Robinson, T. P., Teillant, A., & Laxminarayan, R. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1503141112 · Cited by 3,973
Zhang, Q.-Q., Ying, G.-G., Pan, C.-G., Liu, Y.-S., & Zhao, J.-L. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00729 · Cited by 3,852
Self-citationGlobal increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015
Klein, E. Y., Van Boeckel, T. P., Martinez, E. M., Pant, S., Gandra, S., Levin, S. A., Goossens, H., & Laxminarayan, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1717295115 · Cited by 3,232
Sheng, G.-P., Yu, H.-Q., & Li, X.-Y. (2010) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.08.001 · Cited by 3,113
Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions
Tan, X., Liu, Y., Zeng, G., Wang, X., Hu, X., Gu, Y., & Yang, Z. (2015) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.058 · Cited by 2,081
Self-citationMichael, I., Rizzo, L., McArdell, C. S., Manaia, C. M., Merlin, C., Schwartz, T., Dagot, C., & Fatta-Kassinos, D. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.027 · Cited by 2,013
Tran, N. H., Reinhard, M., & Gin, K. Y.-H. (2018) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.029 · Cited by 1,686
Review of antibiotic resistance in China and its environment
Qiao, M., Ying, G.-G., Singer, A. C., & Zhu, Y.-G. (2018) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.10.016 · Cited by 1,494
Self-citationDegradation of antibiotics by advanced oxidation processes: An overview
Wang, J., & Zhuan, R. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135023 · Cited by 1,365
Cited by
Microalgae-based wastewater treatment: Mechanisms, challenges, recent advances, and future prospects
Abdelfattah, A., Ali, S. S., Ramadan, H., El-Aswar, E. I., Eltawab, R., Ho, S.-H., Elsamahy, T., Li, S., El-Sheekh, M. M., Schagerl, M., et al. (2023) · Environmental Science and Ecotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.ese.2022.100205 · Cited by 894
“For instance, the addition of sodium acetate was found to enhance ciprofloxacin removal efficiency by Ceratozamia mexicana from 13% to 56% [110].”
BackgroundHejna, M., Kapuścińska, D., & Aksmann, A. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19137717 · Cited by 279
Algae-mediated antibiotic wastewater treatment: a critical review
Li, S., Show, P. L., Ngo, H. H., & Ho, S.-H. (2022) · Environmental Science and Ecotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.ese.2022.100145 · Cited by 253
Dayana Priyadharshini, S., Suresh Babu, P., Manikandan, S., Subbaiya, R., Govarthanan, M., & Karmegam, N. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117989 · Cited by 232
Bhatt, P., Bhandari, G., Turco, R. F., Aminikhoei, Z., Bhatt, K., & Simsek, H. (2022) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119688 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiong, Q., Hu, L.-X., Liu, Y.-S., Zhao, J.-L., He, L.-Y., & Ying, G.-G.
- Venue
- Environment International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 155
- Pages
- 106594
- ISSN
- 0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3159275496
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 153
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microalgae-based technology for antibiotics removal: From mechanisms to application of innovational hybrid systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106594
- The paper
- Xiong, Q., Hu, L.-X., Liu, Y.-S., Zhao, J.-L., He, L.-Y., & Ying, G.-G. (2021). Microalgae-based technology for antibiotics removal: From mechanisms to application of innovational hybrid systems. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
