Cited by 216Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalHeavy metals in environment

The removal of heavy metals in urban runoff by sorption on mulch

Jang, Am, Seo, Youngwoo, Bishop, Paul L.·2005·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

A series of adsorption experiments was conducted in order to assess the ability of three mulches to remove several of the heavy metal ions typically encountered in urban runoff. Three types of mulch, cypress bark (C), hardwood bark (H), and pine bark nugget (P), were selected as potential sorbents to capture heavy metals in urban runoff. The hardwood bark (H) mulch had the best physicochemical properties for adsorption of heavy metal ions. In addition, because of its fast removal rate and acceptably high capacity for all the heavy metal ions, it was concluded that the H mulch is the best of the three adsorbents for treatment of urban runoff containing trace amounts of heavy metals. In order to investigate the sorption isotherm, two equilibrium models, the Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms, were analyzed. The sorption of these metals on H mulch conformed to the linear form of the Langmuir adsorption equation. At pH 5 and 6, the Langmuir constants (S(m)) for each metal were found to be 0.324 and 0.359 mmol/g (Cu); 0.306 and 0.350 mmol/g (Pb); and 0.185 and 0.187 mmol/g (Zn) at 25 degrees C.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.05.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Established treatment methods of urban runoff include liquid extraction, precipitation, reverse osmosis, and ion exchange, which achieve acceptable discharge concentrations but are not always economical or technically feasible.

    “Established treatment methods of urban runoff include liquid extraction, precipitation, reverse osmosis, and ion exchange, methods which achieve acceptable discharge concentrations; however, they are not always economical or technically feasible [5].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 216

Authors
Jang, A., Seo, Y., & Bishop, P. L.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Bishop, Paul L.
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
133
Issue
1
Pages
117-127
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081619665
Cited by
216
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
Keywords
heavy metal removal, urban runoff, mulch, sorption, adsorption isotherms, Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, copper, lead, zinc, adsorbents
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Cities, Environmental Pollution, Rain, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification, Metals, Heavy, Plant Bark

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review